Comparison of remineralization by fluoride varnishes with and without casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate in primary teeth

Authors

  • Nehal Raid Salman Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Pharos University, Alexandria, Egypt;
  • Magda ElTekeya Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt;
  • Niveen Bakry Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt;
  • Samia Soliman Omar Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt;
  • Maha El Tantawi Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2018.1490967

Keywords:

Amorphous calcium phosphate, tooth remineralization, tooth, deciduous, microscopy, polarization

Abstract

Objective: To compare MI (5% NaF with 2% CPP-ACP) and Prevident (5% NaF) varnishes in remineralizing caries-like lesions in primary teeth regarding calcium and phosphate enamel content and lesion depth.

Material and methods: Caries-like lesions were created in 48 primary teeth which were divided into 2 halves; one left untreated (control) and the other half treated with MI or Prevident varnishes. Calcium and phosphate content was assessed using energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer and reduction in lesion depth was assessed using polarized light microscopy. Demineralization and remineralization values in each group were compared using paired t test and percentage change between groups was compared using t test and Mann Whitney U test.

Results: A greater percentage increase of calcium was observed in MI than Prevident specimens (median = 8.97 and 2.67, p < .0001), with greater calcium phosphate ratio percentage increase (median = 28.96 and 7.40) and phosphate percentage reduction (median = 15.5 and 4.51). The mean (SD) percentages reduction in lesion depth in the MI varnish was significantly greater than in Prevident varnish (44.41 (7.12) and 22.73 (9.35), p < .0001).

Conclusions: MI varnish had better remineralization effect in primary teeth than Prevident varnish in terms of higher mineral content and shallower lesion depth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-02