Prosthetic dental restorations in Swedish samples: prevalence and agreement between self-report, clinical findings, and influence on quality of life

Authors

  • Nina Lundegren Department of Oral Diagnostics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
  • Melvin M Sohrabi Department of Oral Prosthodontics, the Eastman Institute, Public Dental Health, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Margareta Molin Thorén Department of Odontology, Prosthetic Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
  • Sigvard Åkerman Department of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2018.1542505

Keywords:

Self-assessment, quality of life, agreement, fixed partial dentures, removable dentures

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence of dental prosthetic restorations in an adult population, to study the agreement between self-reports and clinical findings of prosthetic restorations, and to study answers from a questionnaire in relation to the prevalence of prosthetic restorations.

Material and methods: A questionnaire was sent to a sample of 10,000 adults. A further sample of 1000 individuals was invited to answer the questionnaire and also participate in a clinical study. The agreement between self-report and clinical findings was analyzed, as were the associations between prosthetic restorations and questionnaire responses, using the chi2 test.

Results: A total of 40% of the sample had fixed dental prostheses (FDP), 2.7% had removable dentures. The agreement between self-report and clinical findings was 93%. 34.7% of the individuals with no prosthetic restorations were university graduates and 4% of individuals with removable complete dentures. Oral health had the greatest impact on the quality of life of younger individuals with FDP, with an OHIP-14 (Oral Health Impact Profile) score of 7.3 for the age group 20–39 years compared to 4.9 for the age group 65–89 years. Conclusion: The questionnaire method can be a cost-effective way to determine the prevalence of prosthetic restorations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-19