Evaluation of pain, disruptive behaviour and anxiety in children aging 5-8 years old undergoing different modalities of local anaesthetic injection for dental treatment: a randomised clinical trial

Authors

  • Priscila de Camargo Smolarek Departament of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil
  • Leonardo Siqueira da Silva Departament of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil
  • Paula Regina Dias Martins Departament of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil
  • Karen da Cruz Hartman Departament of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil
  • Marcelo Carlos Bortoluzzi Departament of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil
  • Ana Cláudia Rodrigues Chibinski Departament of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2020.1757752

Keywords:

Local anaesthesia, paediatric dentistry, pain management

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of different local anaesthetic techniques in pain, disruptive behaviour and anxiety in children´s dental treatment.

Material and methods: This was a randomised and parallel clinical trial. The sample consisted of 105 children (5–8 years old) that were divided into three groups (n = 35) according to the anaesthetic technique: conventional anaesthesia (CA); vibrational anaesthesia (VBA); computer-controlled local anaesthesia delivery (CCLAD). The outcomes were self-perception of pain (Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale – WBF; Numerical Rating Scale – NRS); disruptive behaviour (Face, Legg, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale – FLACC); anxiety (Corah’s Dental Anxiety Scale; modified Venham Picture test – VPTm) and physiological parameters (blood pressure – systolic – SBP and diastolic – DBP; heart rate – HR; oxygen saturation – SpO2; respiratory rate – RR). Data were statistically analysed with Kruskall-Wallis test and ANOVA for repeated measures with Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05).

Results: All the patients exhibited the same level of dental anxiety at baseline (Corah’s Dental Anxiety Scale). There was no difference in self-perception pain, irrespective the evaluation tool used (WBF – p = .864; VAS – p = .761). No differences were detected in disruptive behaviour (FLACC – p = .318); anxiety (VPTm – p = .274); blood pressure (SBP – p = .239; DBP – p = .512); heart rate (p = .728); oxygen saturation (p = .348) and respiratory rate (p = .238) between anaesthetic techniques.

Conclusion: Different anaesthetic dental local techniques do not affect the levels of pain, disruptive behaviour, anxiety and physiological parameters in children aged 5–8 years old.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-17