Nanoencapsulated fluoride as a remineralization option for dental erosion: an in vitro study

Authors

  • Juliane Rolim de Lavôr a Morphology Department, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil
  • Nayanna Lana Soares Fernandes a Morphology Department, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil
  • Elizabeth Barreto Galvão de Sousa a Morphology Department, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil
  • Juliellen Luiz da Cunha a Morphology Department, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil
  • Ingrid Andrade Meira b Graduate Program of Dentistry Clinic, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil
  • Fábio Correia Sampaio a Morphology Department, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil
  • Andressa Feitosa Bezerra de Oliveira c Clinical and Social Dentistry Department, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2020.1849793

Keywords:

Dental erosion;, dentifrices;, fluoride;, tooth remineralization;, nanotechnology

Abstract

Abstract Objective

To compare the in vitro performance of different dentifrices indicated for dental erosion and a new dentifrice with controlled fluoride release system (NanoF) in terms of surface microhardness remineralization in enamel erosion lesions.

Materials and methods

72 human enamel specimens were divided into 6 groups (n = 12): PC (100% NaF – positive control); NC (Placebo – negative control); 50%nF (50% NanoF + 50% free NaF), 100%nF (100% NanoF); PN (Sensodyne® ProNamel™) and AG (Colgate® Sensitive Pro-Relief™). A surface microhardness analysis was performed before (SH0) and after (SH1) the erosion lesion formation. The blocks were submitted to a 5-day de-remineralization cycling model, consisting of 90 s immersion on 0.1% citric acid (4x/day) and 1 min treatment with dentifrice slurries along with 1 mL/block of human saliva (2x/day). Lastly, the final surface microhardness analysis (SH2) was measured and the percentage of surface microhardness remineralization (%SMHR) was calculated. Data were analysed with 2-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p < .05).

Results

Statistically significant differences were observed for SH2 and %SMHR between NC and AG with the other groups (p < .05). The best %SMHR from the experimental groups was found in 100%nF and PN.

Conclusion

Dentifrices with NanoF exhibited a surface microhardness remineralization similar to sodium fluoride (PC). Therefore, NanoF dentifrice can be an alternative to prevent and treat patients with dental erosion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-04