Does orthognathic treatment improve patients’ psychosocial well-being?

Authors

  • Outi Marja Elina Alanko a Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; b Faculty of Social Sciences (Psychology), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
  • Anna-Liisa Svedström-Oristo a Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; c Department of Oral Diseases, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
  • Auli Suominen d Community Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  • Tero Soukka c Department of Oral Diseases, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
  • Timo Peltomäki e Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland; f Institute of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland; g Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland; h Department of Ear and Oral Diseases, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
  • Martti T. Tuomisto b Faculty of Social Sciences (Psychology), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2021.1977384

Keywords:

Orthognathic surgery, psychological flexibility, quality of life, treatment outcome

Abstract

Objective

To analyse changes in patients’ psychosocial well-being from before treatment until post-surgical orthodontic treatment (including retention) is completed.

Materials and methods

Data was collected six times: before treatment (T0), 6–8 weeks after the placement of orthodontic appliances (T2), 3–4 weeks before surgery (T3), six weeks after surgery (T4), one year after surgery (T5) and after completing orthodontic treatment (T6; 20–57 months after surgery). At T0, 60 patients participated while at T6, data was available for 15 patients. All patients completed the Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Questionnaire (RSES), Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQ-II) and the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90). All pairwise comparisons between variables were conducted with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

OQLQ function, RSES, AAQ-II and SCL GSI worsened from T0 to T2. At T5, improvements compared to T0 were found in all aspects of OQLQ and SCL GSI. When comparing results at T6 to T0, improvements where only found in OQLQ sum, OQLQ facial aesthetics and OQLQ function.

Conclusions

Although well-being of orthognathic patients seems to improve during treatment, many improvements cannot be verified anymore at the completion of the retention period. Most stable changes are found in the oral function component and in the facial aesthetics component of the OQLQ.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-03