Antibiotic utilization in emergency dental care in Stockholm 2016: a cross sectional study

Authors

  • Dalia Khalil a Department of Dentistry, King Fahad General Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; b Division of Periodontology, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Gabriel Baranto c Folktandvården Stockholms län AB, Folktandvården Tumba, Sweden
  • Bodil Lund d Division of Oral Diagnostics and Oral Rehabilitation, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden; e Medical Unit for Reconstructive Plastic- and Craniofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Margareta Hultin f Department of Dental Medicine, Division of Periodontology, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2022.2049864

Keywords:

Acute odontogenic infection, antibiotic prescription, emergency dental clinic

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate systemic antibiotics utilization in emergency dental care and to determine the most common treatment measures performed during emergency visits in public versus private emergency care in Sweden.

Material and methods

Two questionnaires were answered by dentists at one large public and one large private emergency dental clinic in Stockholm, Sweden. The first questionnaire pertained to the emergency care provided to patients (n = 1023) and the second concerned the dentists’ (n = 13) own knowledge and attitudes towards antibiotic treatment and oral infections. The results of the questionnaires were tested using a Chi-square test.

Results

Sixteen percent of all patients seeking emergency dental treatment received antibiotics. The most common overall reason for visiting an emergency clinic was pain (52%, n = 519). The most common diagnoses made by the participating dentists in the public clinic were tooth/filling fracture (17%, n = 91) and gingivitis (14%, n = 76), while in the private clinic they were tooth fracture (29%, n = 146) and symptomatic apical periodontitis (15%, n = 72). Although the number of patients with infection was higher in the public care clinic, there was no significant difference in total number of antibiotic prescriptions between the two clinics. The rate of patients receiving antibiotic prescription as sole treatment was 41% (n = 34) in private care and 31% (n = 18) in public care. Thirty-one percent (n = 4) of dentists prescribed antibiotics for patients with diagnoses normally not requiring antibiotics, citing reasons such as time limitation, patient request, patient travel, patient safety, and follow-up not possible.

Conclusion

Although antibiotic prescription frequency among the Swedish emergency care dentists participating in this study was low, areas for improvement could include providing education to improve dentists’ knowledge on both antibiotic prescription in emergency dental care and treatment of acute oral infections.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-03