Dental clinicians recognizing signs of dental anxiety: a grounded theory study

Authors

  • Markus Höglund a Centre for Orofacial Medicine, Public Dental Service Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden; b Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Inger Wårdh b Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden;c Academic Center of Geriatric Dentistry, Stockholm, Sweden; d Department of Health Sciences, University of Karlstad, Karlstad, Sweden
  • Shervin Shahnavaz e Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; f The Centre for Psychotherapy Education & Research, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Carina Berterö g Division of Nursing Sciences and Reproductive Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2022.2154263

Keywords:

Grounded theory, behavioural research, dental anxiety, diagnosis, dental staff

Abstract

Introduction and Objective

There is a knowledge gap in how dental clinicians recognise dental anxiety. The aim of this study was to identify, describe and generate concepts regarding this process.

Materials and Methods

Eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted with dental clinicians from the public dental service of Östergötland, Sweden. Purposive and theoretical sampling was used. Theoretical saturation was reached after eight interviews. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Classical grounded theory was used to inductively analyse data by constant comparative analysis.

Results

The core category was identified as; ‘the clinical eye’, clinicians noticing behaviours possibly due to dental anxiety based on their knowledge, experiences, or intuition. The core category comprises the five categories: Sympathetic activationPatient-reported anxietyControlling behavioursAvoidance and Accomplishment. Initially there is usually uncertainty about whether a behaviour is due to dental anxiety or part of a patient’s normal behaviour. To gain additional certainty, clinicians need to recognise a stressor as something in the dental setting by observing a change in behaviour, for better or for worse, in the anticipation, presence or removal of the stressor.

Conclusions

Clinicians identify patients as dentally anxious if their behaviour changes with exposure to a stressor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-04