Circadian rhythms and gene expression during mouse molar tooth development

Authors

  • Minou Nirvani Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Cuong Khuu Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Tor Paaske Utheim Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Ophthalmology, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway; Faculty of Health Sciences, University College of South East Norway, Kongsberg, Norway
  • Henriette Stavik Hollingen Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Simon Furre Amundsen Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Lars Peter Sand Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Amer Sehic Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2016.1271999

Keywords:

Clock genes, dental enamel, microarrays, microRNAs, odontogenesis

Abstract

Objectives: Incremental markings in dental enamel suggest that the circadian clock may influence the molecular underpinnings orchestrating enamel formation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the genes and microRNAs (miRNAs) oscillate in a circadian pattern during tooth and enamel development.

Material and methods: Comparative gene and miRNA expression profiling of the first mandibular molar tooth germ isolated at different time-points during the light and night period was performed using microarrays and validated using real-time RT-PCR. Bioinformatic analysis was carried out using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA), and TargetScan software was used in order to identify computationally predicted miRNA–mRNA target relationships.

Results: In total, 439 genes and 32 miRNAs exhibited significantly different (p < 0.05) levels of expression in the light phase compared with the night phase tooth germs. Genes involved in enamel formation, i.e. AmelxAmbn, Amtn, and Odam, oscillated in a circadian pattern. Furthermore, the circadian clock genes, in particular Clock and Bmal1, oscillated in mouse molar tooth germ during 24-h intervals. The expression of Clock and Bmal1 was inversely correlated with the expression of miR-182 and miR-141, respectively.

Conclusions: MiRNAs, including miR-182 and miR-141, are involved in the control of peripheral circadian rhythms in the developing tooth by regulating the expression of genes coding for circadian transcription factors such as CLOCK and BMAL1. Regulation of circadian rhythms may be important for enamel phenotype, and the morphology of dental enamel may vary between individuals due to differences in circadian profiles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-17