Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness

Authors

  • Keisuke Nakamura Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Materials Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Laboratory for Redox Regulation, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan
  • Akio Harada Division of Molecular and Regenerative Prosthodontics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan
  • Ryoichi Inagaki Tohoku University School of Dental Laboratory Technicians, Sendai, Japan
  • Taro Kanno Division of Molecular and Regenerative Prosthodontics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan
  • Yoshimi Niwano Laboratory for Redox Regulation, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan
  • Percy Milleding Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Materials Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Ulf Örtengren Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Materials Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden;Department of Clinical Dentistry/Faculty of Health Sciences, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2015.1007479

Keywords:

computer-aided design, lithium disilicate, X-ray microtomography, zirconium oxide

Abstract

Objectives. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the relationship between fracture load of monolithic zirconia crowns and axial/occlusal thickness and to evaluate the fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns with reduced thickness in comparison with that of monolithic lithium disilicate crowns with regular thickness. Materials and methods. Monolithic zirconia crowns (Lava Plus Zirconia, 3M/ESPE) with specified axial/occlusal thicknesses and lithium disilicate crowns (IPS e.max press, Ivoclar/Vivadent) with regular thickness were fabricated using a dental CAD/CAM system and a press technique, respectively. The crowns cemented onto dies were loaded until fracture. Based on measurements of the crown thickness made by micro-CT and the fracture load, multiple regression analysis was performed. Results. It was revealed that the occlusal thickness significantly affected the fracture load (p < 0.01), but the axial thickness did not (p = 0.2828). Although the reduction of the occlusal thickness decreased the fracture resistance of the monolithic zirconia crowns, the fracture load of the zirconia crowns with the occlusal thickness of 0.5 mm (5558 ± 522 N) was significantly higher than that of lithium disilicate crowns with an occlusal thickness of 1.5 mm (3147 ± 409 N). Conclusion. Within the limitations of the present study, it is suggested that monolithic zirconia crown with chamfer width of 0.5 mm and occlusal thickness of 0.5 mm can be used in the molar region in terms of fracture resistance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-17