Influence of photo-curing distance on bond strength and nanoleakage of self-etching adhesive bonds to enamel and dentin

Authors

  • Cíntia Tereza Pimenta de Araújo Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, State University of Campinas, SP, Brazil; Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Sciences of Health, Federal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valley - UFVJM, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • Lúcia Trazzi Prieto Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, State University of Campinas, SP, Brazil
  • Adriano Fonseca Lima Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, State University of Campinas, SP, Brazil; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Nove de Julho University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • Eduardo José Souza-Junior Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, State University of Campinas, SP, Brazil
  • Carlos Tadeu Santos Dias Department of Statistical Mathematics, Luiz de Queiroz Higher School of Agriculture of the University of São Paulo (Esalq/USP), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
  • Luís Alexandre Maffei Sartini Paulillo Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, State University of Campinas, SP, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2013.805431

Keywords:

Microtensile bond strength, photoactivation, nanoleakage

Abstract

Objectives. To assess the influence of light-curing unit tip distance on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and nanoleakage of self-etching adhesives to enamel and dentin. Materials and methods. Flat buccal surfaces were prepared on 198 bovine incisors. The teeth were randomly assigned into nine groups for μTBS (n = 8) and nanoleakage (n = 3) testing according to the adhesive system (Clearfil Protect Bond, Clearfil Tri-S Bond or One Up Bond F Plus) and distance from the light-curing tip (0, 3 or 6 mm). The bonded samples were tested in tension (0.5 mm/min) and nanoleakage was analyzed using SEM. Results. Clearfil Protect Bond exhibited the highest tensile strength on both enamel and dentin. Leakage was higher in samples exposed at a distance of 6 mm on enamel and 0 mm on dentin. One Up Bond F Plus experienced the greatest amount of nanoleakage on both substrates. Conclusions. Light-curing unit distance did not influence the μTBS of the adhesives, but nanoleakage increased on enamel samples when photoactivation occurred at a distance of 6 mm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2014-02-01