Stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesis with external and internal implant-abutment connections

Authors

  • Marcelo Coelho Goiato Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Rosse Mary Falcón-Antenucci Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Daniela Micheline dos Santos Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Marcela Filié Haddad Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Lisiane Cristina Bannwart Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Amália Moreno Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.672823

Keywords:

dental implants, biomechanics, fixed prosthesis, photoelastic stress analysisscrew retained

Abstract

Abstract

Objective. This study aimed to investigate the stress distribution in screwed implant-supported prostheses with different implant-abutment connections by using a photoelastic analysis. Materials and methods. Four photoelastic models were fabricated in PL-2 resin and divided according to the implant-abutment connection (external hexagon (EH) and Morse taper (MT) implants (3.75 × 11.5 mm)) and the number crowns (single and 3-unit piece). Models were positioned in a circular polariscope and 100-N axial and oblique (45) loading were applied in the occlusal surface of the crowns by using a universal testing machine. The stresses were photographically recorded and qualitatively analyzed using software (Adobe Photoshop). Results. Under axial loading, the MT implants exhibited a lower number of fringes for single-unit crowns than EH implants, whereas for a 3-unit piece the MT implants showed a higher number of fringes vs EH implants. The oblique loading increased the number of fringes for all groups. Conclusion. In conclusion, the MT implant-abutment connection reduced the amount of stress in single-unit crowns, for 3-unit piece crowns the amount of stress was lower using an external hexagon connection. The stress pattern was similar for all groups. Oblique loading promoted a higher stress concentration than axial loading.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2013-03-01