In vitro effect of paediatric liquid medicines on deciduous enamel exposed to biofilm

Authors

  • Daniela Novaes Soares Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Andréa Gonçalves Antonio Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; School of Dentistry, Universidade Veiga de Almeida, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Viviane Santos da Silva Pierro Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; School of Dentistry, Universidade Salgado de Oliveira, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Natalia Lopes Pontes Iorio Department of Basic Sciences, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Nova Friburgo, Brazil; Department of Medical Microbiology, Prof. Paulo de Goés Microbiology Institute, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Kátia Regina Netto dos Santos Department of Medical Microbiology, Prof. Paulo de Goés Microbiology Institute, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Lucianne Cople Maia Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.750013

Keywords:

dental biofilm, microhardness, deciduous tooth, use of medications

Abstract

Objective. This study aimed to assess the in vitro effects of paediatric liquid medicines on deciduous enamel exposed to biofilms. Methods. Fragments (n = 25) of first primary molars were covered by nail varnish, leaving a 22 mm2 exposure area. Specimens were fixed in polystyrene plates containing BHI broth media. Pooled human saliva was added to form a mature biofilm on fragments over a 10-day period in microaerophilic conditions. Specimens were divided into groups (n = 5 per group) and treated (50 μL) daily for 1 min over 1 week as follows: G1 = 10% sucrose solution (positive control); G2 = Dimetapp Elixir® (antihistamine); G3 = Claritin® (antihistamine); and G4 = Klaricid® (antibiotic). Five other fragments, without treatment and inoculum represented the blank controls. The covered area for each specimen represented the negative control. Cross-sectional hardness of the enamel was used as a demineralization indicator. Results. All treatment groups showed hardness loss compared to the corresponding negative controls (p < 0.05). Among the treatment groups, G2 exhibited the greatest demineralization pattern (p < 0.05) followed by G3, G1 and G4. Conclusion. All medicines caused deciduous enamel demineralization in the presence of biofilm. The greatest hardness loss was observed after treatment with Dimetapp Elixir®.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2013-09-01