Effect of light curing modes on mechanical properties of direct and indirect composites

Authors

  • Anderson Catelan Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Márcia Regina do Espírito Santo Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Lívia Maluf Menegazzo Department of Physics and Chemistry, Ilha Solteira School of Engineering, São Paulo State University, Ilha Solteira, São Paulo, Brazil
  • João Carlos Silos Moraes Department of Physics and Chemistry, Ilha Solteira School of Engineering, São Paulo State University, Ilha Solteira, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Paulo Henrique dos Santos Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.715193

Keywords:

composite resins, degree of conversion, flexural strength, hardness, mechanical properties

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength (FS) and Knoop microhardness (KHN) of direct and indirect composite resins polymerized with different curing systems. Materials and methods. Specimens of direct (Z250, 3M/Espe) and indirect (Sinfony, 3M/Espe) restorative materials were made and polymerized using two light curing units: XL2500 (3M/Espe) and Visio system (3M/Espe). Absorption spectra of both composites were obtained on a FTIR spectrometer in order to calculate the DC. FS was evaluated in a universal testing machine and surface microhardness was performed in a microhardness tester (50gf/15s). DC, FS and KHN data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Results. Z250 showed higher DC, FS and KHN compared with Sinfony when the polymerization was carried out with XL2500 (p < 0.05). However, there is no statistical difference in DC between the materials when Visio was used (p > 0.05). Visio showed higher DC and KHN for Z250 and Sinfony than the values obtained using XL2500 light curing (p < 0.05). For FS, no significant difference between curing units was found (p > 0.05). Conclusion. Even though the Visio system could increase DC and KHN for some direct and indirect composites, compared with the conventional halogen curing unit, a high number of monomers did not undergo conversion during the polymerization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-01