Caregivers' oral health literacy and their young children's oral health-related quality-of-life

Authors

  • Kimon Divaris Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry; Department of Epidemiology
  • Jessica Yuna Lee Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry; Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
  • Arnett Diane Baker Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry
  • William Felix Vann Jr Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2011.629627

Keywords:

oral health literacy, oral health-related quality-of-Life, children, early childhood, subjective oral health, REALD-30

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the association of caregivers' oral health literacy (OHL) with their children's oral health related-quality of life (C-OHRQoL) and explore literacy as a modifier in the association between children's oral health status (COHS) and C-OHRQoL. Methods. This study relied upon data from structured interviews with 203 caregivers of children aged 3–5 from the Carolina Oral Health Literacy (COHL) Project. Data were collected for OHL using REALD-30, caregiver-reported COHS using the NHANES-item and C-OHRQoL using the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS). This study also measured oral health behaviors (OHBs) and socio-demographic characteristics and calculated overall/stratified summary estimates for OHL and C-OHRQoL. Spearman's rho and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed as measures of correlation of OHL and COHS with C-OHRQoL. To determine whether OHL modified the association between COHS and C-OHRQoL, this study compared literacy-specific summary and regression estimates. Results. Reported COHS was: excellent—50%, very good—28%, good—14%, fair—6%, poor—2%. The aggregate C-OHRQoL mean score was 2.0 (95% CI: 1.4, 2.6), and the mean OHL score 15.9 (95% CI: 15.2, 16.7). There was an inverse relationship between COHS and C-OHRQoL: ρ = −0.32 (95% CI: −0.45, −0.18). There was no important association between OHL and C-OHRQoL; however, deleterious OHBs were associated with worse C-OHRQoL. Literacy-specific linear and Poisson regression estimates of the association between COHS and C-OHRQoL departed from homogeneity (Wald χ 2 p < 0.2). Conclusion: In this community-based sample of caregiver/child dyads, a strong correlation was found between OHS and C-OHRQoL. The association's magnitude and gradient were less pronounced among caregivers with low literacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2012-09-01