Influence of filler addition, storage medium and evaluation time on biaxial flexure strength and modulus of adhesive systems

Authors

  • Marcelo Giannini Department of Restorative Dentistry, Operative Dentistry Division, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
  • Michele Santana Liberti Department of Restorative Dentistry, Operative Dentistry Division, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
  • César Augusto Galvão Arrais Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Guarulhos, Guarulhos, SP, Brazil
  • André Figueiredo Reis Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Guarulhos, Guarulhos, SP, Brazil
  • Donald Mettenburg Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Dental Materials Section, School of Dentistry, Georgia Health Sciences University, Augusta, GA, USA
  • Frederick Allen Rueggeberg Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Dental Materials Section, School of Dentistry, Georgia Health Sciences University, Augusta, GA, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2011.639308

Keywords:

adhesive, biaxial flexural strength, flexural modulus, filler

Abstract

Objective. This study evaluated the effects of filler addition, storage medium and time on biaxial flexural strength and flexural modulus of six adhesive systems. Materials and methods. The adhesives were either unfilled resins: Single Bond, Prime&Bond 2.1 and One-Step; or filled resins: Single Bond Plus, Prime&Bond NT and One-Step Plus. Resin discs of each product (0.5 mm thick × 6.0 mm diameter) were prepared using silicon molds (n = 10). The discs were stored dry, in water, mineral oil or ethanol for 1 week or 3 months before biaxial flexural testing. Data were statistically analyzed by 3-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (α = 0.05). The specimens were tested in a universal testing machine at 1.27 mm/min until failure occurred. Results. In general, the storage in ethanol led to significantly lower flexural strength and flexural modulus values than the other storage conditions for all adhesives in both storage periods. Filler addition increased flexural strength and flexural modulus for Prime&Bond NT, when it was stored dry or in water for 1 week. For Single Bond Plus, the filler addition resulted in higher flexural modulus, when it was stored for 1 week in oil and in ethanol. No significant differences in flexural modulus were observed between One-Step and One-Step Plus in any storage medium. Conclusions. Results suggested that filler addition does not necessarily have to increase the flexural strength and flexural modulus. Ethanol and oil storages tended to yield opposite effects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2012-12-01