Load-bearing capacity of handmade and computer-aided design–computer-aided manufacturing-fabricated three-unit fixed dental prostheses of particulate filler composite

Authors

  • Emine Göncü Başaran Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey
  • Emrah Ayna Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey
  • Pekka K. Vallittu Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Institute of Dentistry, Turku University, Turku, Finland
  • Lippo V. J. Lassila Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Institute of Dentistry, Turku University, Turku, Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2010.545034

Keywords:

Experimental composite, fixed dental prostheses, load-bearing capacity

Abstract

Objective. To compare handmade and computer-aided design–computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM)-fabricated fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) composed of a particulate filler composite. Material and methods. Handmade FDPs were made of restorative composite (Z 100) and CAD-CAM-fabricated FDPs were made of commercial CAD-CAM blocks (VITA Temp) and two experimental CAD-CAM blocks of particulate filler composite. Experimental CAD composite A was prepared by mixing 31.2 wt.% of dimethacrylate resin with 68.7 wt.% of filler particles of barium oxide silicate (BaSiO2). Experimental CAD composite B was prepared by mixing 25.6 wt.% of dimethacrylate resin with 74.3 wt.% of filler particles of BaSiO2. Six groups were fabricated (n = 6 in each); FDPs were statically loaded until final fracture. Results. Experimental CAD composites A and B revealed the highest load-bearing capacity of the FDPs, while Z 100 showed the lowest. Conclusion. FDPs made of experimental CAD composite blocks showed higher load-bearing capacities than handmade commercial composites and commercial blocks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2011-05-01