Evaluation of two Methods of Scoring Denture Plaque

Authors

  • Sven Poulsen Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oral Biology, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Ejvind Budtz-jørgensen Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oral Biology, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark
  • A. M. Knudsen Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oral Biology, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark
  • L. Nielsen Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oral Biology, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Jens Kelstrup Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oral Biology, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358309162336

Keywords:

Indices, photography, reliability

Abstract

In a previously published study on the effect of an alcalase on development of denture plaque, two different methods were used to quantify plaque on the fitting surface of maxillary dentures. Both methods were based on scoring of photographs at × 10 magnification. In one of the methods the percentage area was estimated with 10% intervals from 0% to 100%. By the other method dentures were ranked according to cleanliness based on area and on degree of staining of plaque. The number of dentures in each of the 14 treatment periods was 14 or 15. The present study was conducted to determine the reliability of the two methods. Reliability of the two methods was determined by using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Kendall's tau. Both intra- and inter-examiner reliability was high. A high correlation between the two methods was also demonstrated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1983-01-01