Socio-economic risk indicators for apical periodontitis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350500469680Keywords:
Dental fear, epidemiology, health, periapical disease, womenAbstract
Objective. The aim of this study was to reveal possible socio-economic risk indicators for apical periodontitis. Material and Methods. In 1992–93 a representative sample of women in Göteborg, Sweden, aged 38–84 years, participated in a medical and dental survey (n=981) which included dental and medical examinations and dental radiographic examination (OP). The dependent variable was apical periodontitis (AP = 0, AP > 0). The independent variables were age, number of teeth, number of restored teeth, number of root-filled teeth, number of teeth with carious lesions, satisfactory masticatory function, and dental esthetics as crude measures of self-reported dental health, dental anxiety, time elapsed since last visit to a dental office, regular dental visiting habits, smoking, alcohol habits, and marital status. A subjective evaluation of economy, health and life situation (acceptable or poor) was accounted for as socio-economic variables. The oldest age group, women born 1908, and edentulous individuals were omitted, leaving 844 subjects for analysis. Statistical analysis included multivariate logistic regression, chi-squared test, and independent t-test for comparison of group characteristics (AP = 0 vs AP > 0). Results. For socio-economic variables there was a significant association between acceptable health and apical periodontitis (OR = 1.72 (CI = 1.09–2.70)). For oral-related variables, root-filled teeth (OR = 1.17 (CI = 1.10–1.23)) and teeth with carious lesions (OR = 1.48 (CI = 1.19–1.85)) were predictive of apical periodontitis. Conclusions. In the present study, socio-economic variables and dental visiting habits did not appear to have obvious implications for periapical health, whereas root-filled teeth and carious lesions were associated with apical periodontitis.
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica publishes original research papers as well as critical reviews relevant to the diagnosis, epidemiology, health service, prevention, aetiology, pathogenesis, pathology, physiology, microbiology, development and treatment of diseases affecting tissues of the oral cavity and associated structures including papers on cause and effect or explanatory/associative relationships for experimental or observational studies.