Analysis of individual, intraspecific and interspecific variability in quantitative parameters of caprine tooth enamel structure

Authors

  • Frederick Edward Grine Department of Anthropology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York, USA; Department of Anatomical Sciences, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York, USA
  • David Wilfred Krause Department of Anthropology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York, USA; Department of Anatomical Sciences, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York, USA
  • Gisle Fosse Department of Anthropology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York, USA; Department of Anatomical Sciences, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York, USA
  • William Lee Jungers Institute of Anatomy, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358709094349

Keywords:

ASI, Anthropology, mammalian tooth enamel, phylogenetic analysis, taxonomic analysis

Abstract

Qualitative and quantitative features of mammalian tooth enamel structure are increasingly being used in taxonomic and phylogenetic analyses, although the variability shown by these traits has not received adequate consideration. This study evaluates the variability displayed by nine quantitative parameters in deep, intermediate, and superficial molar enamel in the closely related bovids Ouis aries and Capra hircus. These parameters are assessed in terms of the absolute and/or relative variability evinced at a given depth within a single individual. among conspecific individuals, and between species samples. The degrees of relative variability expressed at a given depth are comparable among conspecific individuals and between taxonomic samples. Nevertheless, in many instances, there are significant differences in absolute variability amongst individuals. Also, in four parameters for which individual specimen averages could be calculated, the equality of these means among conspecifics can be rejected. Variability is not equivalent at different enamel depths. The null hypothesis of equality of individual, conspecific variances can be rejected most commonly for parameters measured in deep and superficial enamel, and coefficients of variation also tend to be higher for deep and superficial enamel than for enamel of intermediate depth. The greater variability displayed by deep and especially superficial enamel may be related to the initial onset and the terminal phase of ameloblastic secretory activity. Taxonomic and phylogenetic analyses that utilize quantitative data on enamel structure are valid only if comparisons have been made at equivalent enamel depths.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1987-01-01