Caries‐preventive effect of fissure sealants: a systematic review

Authors

  • Ingegerd Mejàre Department of Odontology, Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Centre for Oral health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Departmtne of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Oral & Maxillo-facial Unit, Länssjukhuset, halmstad, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Peter Lingström Department of Odontology, Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Centre for Oral health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Departmtne of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Oral & Maxillo-facial Unit, Länssjukhuset, halmstad, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Lars G. Petersson Department of Odontology, Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Centre for Oral health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Departmtne of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Oral & Maxillo-facial Unit, Länssjukhuset, halmstad, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Anna‐Karin Holm Department of Odontology, Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Centre for Oral health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Departmtne of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Oral & Maxillo-facial Unit, Länssjukhuset, halmstad, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Svante Twetman Department of Odontology, Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Centre for Oral health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Departmtne of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Oral & Maxillo-facial Unit, Länssjukhuset, halmstad, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Carina Källestål Department of Odontology, Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Centre for Oral health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Departmtne of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Oral & Maxillo-facial Unit, Länssjukhuset, halmstad, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Gunilla Nordenram Department of Odontology, Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Centre for Oral health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Departmtne of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Oral & Maxillo-facial Unit, Länssjukhuset, halmstad, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Folke Lagerlöf Department of Odontology, Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Centre for Oral health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Departmtne of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Oral & Maxillo-facial Unit, Länssjukhuset, halmstad, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Birgitta Söder Department of Odontology, Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Centre for Oral health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Departmtne of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Oral & Maxillo-facial Unit, Länssjukhuset, halmstad, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Anders Norlund Department of Odontology, Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Centre for Oral health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Departmtne of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Oral & Maxillo-facial Unit, Länssjukhuset, halmstad, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Susanna Axelsson Department of Odontology, Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Centre for Oral health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Departmtne of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Oral & Maxillo-facial Unit, Länssjukhuset, halmstad, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Helena Dahlgren Department of Odontology, Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Centre for Oral health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Departmtne of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Oral & Maxillo-facial Unit, Länssjukhuset, halmstad, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350310007581

Keywords:

Pit and fissure sealants, systematic review

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate systematically the evidence of the caries‐preventive effect of fissure sealing of occlusal tooth surfaces and to examine factors potentially modifying the effect. The search strategies included electronic databases, reference lists of articles, and selected textbooks. Inclusion criteria were randomized or quasi‐randomized clinical trials or controlled clinical trials comparing fissure sealing with no treatment or another preventive treatment in children up to 14 years of age at the start; the outcome measure was caries increment; the diagnostic criteria had been described; and the follow‐up time was at least 2 years. Inclusion decisions were taken and grading of the studies was done independently by two of the authors. The main measure of effect was relative risk reduction. Thirteen studies using resin‐based or glass ionomer sealant materials were included in the final analysis. The results showed that most studies were performed during the 1970s and a single application had been utilized. The relative caries risk reduction pooled estimate of resin‐based sealants on permanent 1st molars was 33% (relative risk=0.67; CI=0.55-0.83). The effect depended on retention of the sealant. In conclusion, the review suggests limited evidence that fissure sealing of 1st permanent molars with resin‐based materials has a caries‐preventive effect. The evidence is incomplete for permanent 2nd molars, premolars and primary molars and for glass ionomer cements. Overall, there remains a need for further trials of high quality, particularly in child populations with a low and a high caries risk, respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2003-01-01