Dietary factors in the prevention of dental caries: a systematic review

Authors

  • Peter Lingström 1Department of Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Odontology/Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health,Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, Centre for Oral Sciences, Malmö University, Sweden; Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Maxillo-facial Unit, Central Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Anna‐Karin Holm 1Department of Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Odontology/Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health,Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, Centre for Oral Sciences, Malmö University, Sweden; Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Maxillo-facial Unit, Central Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Ingegerd Mejàre 1Department of Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Odontology/Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health,Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, Centre for Oral Sciences, Malmö University, Sweden; Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Maxillo-facial Unit, Central Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Svante Twetman 1Department of Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Odontology/Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health,Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, Centre for Oral Sciences, Malmö University, Sweden; Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Maxillo-facial Unit, Central Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Birgitta Söder 1Department of Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Odontology/Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health,Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, Centre for Oral Sciences, Malmö University, Sweden; Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Maxillo-facial Unit, Central Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Anders Norlund 1Department of Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Odontology/Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health,Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, Centre for Oral Sciences, Malmö University, Sweden; Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Maxillo-facial Unit, Central Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Susanna Axelsson 1Department of Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Odontology/Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health,Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, Centre for Oral Sciences, Malmö University, Sweden; Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Maxillo-facial Unit, Central Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Folke Lagerlöf 1Department of Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Odontology/Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health,Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, Centre for Oral Sciences, Malmö University, Sweden; Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Maxillo-facial Unit, Central Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Gunilla Nordenram 1Department of Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Odontology/Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health,Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, Centre for Oral Sciences, Malmö University, Sweden; Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Maxillo-facial Unit, Central Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Lars G. Petersson 1Department of Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Odontology/Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health,Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, Centre for Oral Sciences, Malmö University, Sweden; Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Maxillo-facial Unit, Central Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Helena Dahlgren 1Department of Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Odontology/Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health,Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, Centre for Oral Sciences, Malmö University, Sweden; Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Maxillo-facial Unit, Central Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Carina Källestål 1Department of Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Odontology/Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden; National Institute of Public Health,Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, Centre for Oral Sciences, Malmö University, Sweden; Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; Maxillo-facial Unit, Central Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350310007798

Keywords:

Dental caries, diet, sugars, sugar substitutes, systematic review

Abstract

The aim of this study was, systematically, to evaluate the effect of dietary changes in the prevention of dental caries. A search and analysis strategy was followed, as suggested by the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). The search strategy for articles published in 1966–2003 was performed using electronic databases and reference lists of articles and selected textbooks. Out of 714 articles originally identified, 18 met the inclusion criteria for a randomized or controlled clinical trial—at least 2 years' follow‐up and caries increment as a primary endpoint. This included the total or partial substitution of sucrose with sugar substitutes or the addition of protective foods to chewing gum. No study was found evaluating the effect of information designed to reduce sugar intake/frequency as a single preventive measure. It is suggested that the evidence for the use of sorbitol or xylitol in chewing gum, or for the use of invert sugar, is inconclusive. No caries‐preventive effect was found from adding calcium phosphate or dicalcium phosphate dihydrate to chewing gums. The review clearly demonstrates the need for well‐designed randomized clinical studies with adequate control groups and high compliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2003-01-01