Caries assessment and restorative treatment thresholds reported by Swedish dentists

Authors

  • Ingegerd Mejàre Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden; Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Odontology (Pedodontics) and Department of Odontology (Cariology), Faculty of Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway
  • Hans Sundberg Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden; Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Odontology (Pedodontics) and Department of Odontology (Cariology), Faculty of Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway
  • Ivar Espelid Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden; Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Odontology (Pedodontics) and Department of Odontology (Cariology), Faculty of Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway
  • Anne Björg Tveit Eastman Dental Institute, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden; Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Odontology (Pedodontics) and Department of Odontology (Cariology), Faculty of Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/000163599428887

Abstract

The aim was to study any variability in approximal and occlusal caries diagnoses and restorative treatment decisions among Swedish dentists. The material consisted of a pre-coded questionnaire sent to a random sample of 923 dentists with 4 items concerning approximal and occlusal caries diagnosis and restorative treatment decisions. Responses were received from 651 (70.5%) dentists. In an adolescent with low caries activity and good oral hygiene, more than 90% of the dentists stated that they would not automatically restore a primary approximal caries lesion if its radiographic appearance did not show obvious progression in the outer 1/3 to 1/2 of the dentin. Moreover, 67% of the dentists would only consider immediate restorative treatment of an occlusal surface if obvious cavitation and/or radiographic signs of dentin caries could be observed. When diagnosing questionable occlusal caries, the dentists largely relied on the radiographic appearance. Concerning both approximal and occlusal caries, the threshold for restorative treatment differed between the metropolitan regions in Sweden, and younger more often than older dentists would postpone restorative treatment of approximal caries until the lesion had reached a relatively advanced stage of progression. The responses also showed that dentists in private practice would restore approximal caries at an earlier stage of progression than the dentists in the Public Dental Health Service.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1999-01-01