Simplified sampling methods for estimating levels of lactobacilli in saliva in dental clinical practice

Authors

  • Pia Gabre Samariterhemmet Hospital Dental Clinic, Public Dental Health Services, County Council of Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Oral Diagnostics, School of Dentistry, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; and Department of Preventive Dentistry, Public Dental Health Services, County of Uppsala, Sweden
  • Thore Martinsson Samariterhemmet Hospital Dental Clinic, Public Dental Health Services, County Council of Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Oral Diagnostics, School of Dentistry, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; and Department of Preventive Dentistry, Public Dental Health Services, County of Uppsala, Sweden
  • Lars Gahnberg Samariterhemmet Hospital Dental Clinic, Public Dental Health Services, County Council of Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Oral Diagnostics, School of Dentistry, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; and Department of Preventive Dentistry, Public Dental Health Services, County of Uppsala, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/000163599428742

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether estimation of lactobacilli was possible with simplified saliva sampling methods. Dentocult® LB (Orion Diagnostica AB, Trosa, Sweden) was used to estimate the number of lactobacilli in saliva sampled by 3 different methods from 96 individuals: (i) Collecting and pouring stimulated saliva over a Dentocult® dip-slide; (ii) direct licking of the Dentocult® LB dip-slide; (iii) contaminating a wooden spatula with saliva and pressing against the Dentocult® dip-slide. The first method was in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and selected as the 'gold standard'; the other 2 methods were compared with this result. The 2 simplified methods for estimating levels of lactobacilli in saliva showed good reliability and specificity. Sensitivity, defined as the ability to detect individuals with a high number of lactabacilli in saliva, was sufficient for the licking method (85%), but significantly reduced for the wooden spatula method (52%).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1999-01-01