Repeated measurements of mood during psychologic treatment of dental fear

Authors

  • Magnus Hakeberg Department of Endodontology/Oral Diagnosis. Faculty of Odontology; Department of Psychology; and Department of Education, Goteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Ulf Berggren Department of Endodontology/Oral Diagnosis. Faculty of Odontology; Department of Psychology; and Department of Education, Goteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Sven G. Carlsson Department of Endodontology/Oral Diagnosis. Faculty of Odontology; Department of Psychology; and Department of Education, Goteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Jan-Eric Gustafsson Department of Endodontology/Oral Diagnosis. Faculty of Odontology; Department of Psychology; and Department of Education, Goteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359709059203

Keywords:

Denial fear, longitudinal analysis, mood, treatment

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to analyze mood changes during psychologic treatment of dental fear by assessing the rate or improvement. Twenty-one patients who refused conventional dental treatment and reported extreme dental anxiety participated in the study. Levels of dental anxiety and mood were measured with the Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS) and a Mood Adjective Checklist (MACL). MACL included two dimensions, degree of relaxation (r) and pleasantness (h) as experienced in a dental situation. Mood was monitored at each treatment session from base line to termination of the therapy (eight measurements) Two different treatment modalities were used, one with a more cognitive approach in = 9) and one emphasizing the relaxation component (n 12). A hierarchical linear models approach was applied to analyze individual change with repeated measurements. The results showed that positive mood changes over time were statistically significant. The mean improvement in mood scores per week and session was estimated for MACL(r) and MACL(h) to be 0.14/week and 0.09/week, respectively. The growth was not affected by DAS levels or treatment mode. This study also illustrated a powerful method for analyzing a longitudinal clinical trial design with repeated measurements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1997-01-01