Dental caries determinants in an adult Portuguese population and a comparison with Norwegian adults

Authors

  • Harald M. Eriksen Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, and Research Center for Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Manuel Desport Marques Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, and Research Center for Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Espen Bjertness Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, and Research Center for Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Bente Moe Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, and Research Center for Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359609003509

Keywords:

Dental caries, epidemiology, Portugal

Abstract

The present epidemiologic dental caries study indicates a high number of decayed surfaces (mean, 13.5 ± 11.8 (SD)) in a Portuguese population of 30- to 39-year-olds from Porto. The most influential determinants for variation in carious surfaces were oral hygiene, gender, salivary buffer capacity, and missing teeth. By entering the most influential independent variables in a final multiple classification analysis, the total explained variance in carious surfaces was 27%. A comparison with results from a similar Norwegian dental health study showed that the biologic factors of importance for number of carious surfaces were the same, whereas the sociocultural determinants differed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1996-01-01