Flexure strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cements and their bond strength to dental composites

Authors

  • Jianguo Li Center for Oral Biology at Novum and Departments of Dental Toxicology, Clinical Research, and Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Yajuan Liu Center for Oral Biology at Novum and Departments of Dental Toxicology, Clinical Research, and Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Yun Liu Center for Oral Biology at Novum and Departments of Dental Toxicology, Clinical Research, and Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Rune Söremark Center for Oral Biology at Novum and Departments of Dental Toxicology, Clinical Research, and Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Folke Sundström Center for Oral Biology at Novum and Departments of Dental Toxicology, Clinical Research, and Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359609003510

Keywords:

Acid etching, dental bonding, dental cements, dental materials

Abstract

The flexure strength of three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and one conventional glass ionomer cement and their bond strength to dental composites were studied by measuring the three-point bending and the shear strengths. The bond strengths between the dental composite and the resin-modified glass ionomer cements were dependent on the curing modes. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements bonded significantly more strongly to cured dental composites than dental composites bonded to cured resin-modified glass ionomer cements. However, the dental composites showed a significantly stronger bonding to the resin-modified glass ionomer cements than to the cured conventional glass ionomer cement, to which the dental composite did not adhere without acid etching. The flexure strengths of the resin-modified glass ionomer cements were significantly improved compared with the conventional one but were still significantly lower than that of the dental composites.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1996-01-01