Axial wall convergence of full veneer crown preparations Documented for dental students and general practitioners

Authors

  • Anna Lena Annerstedt Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Ulrika Engström Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Anna Hansson Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Tomas Jansson Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Stig Karlsson Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Helena Liljhagen Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Eva Lindquist Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Eva Rydhammar Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Maria Tyreman-Bandhede Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Pernilla Svensson Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Ulrich Wandel Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359609006014

Keywords:

Convergence angle, crowns, dental abutments

Abstract

The convergence angle in 478 full crown preparations was assessed. Of these preparations, 351 had been performed by general practitioners and 127 by dental students. Groups of preparations performed on incisors, premolars, and molars were compared, as were preparations performed by dentists and students. Two different convergence angles were measured for each tooth, buccolingually and mesiodistally. The results showed a mean angle of 21°. The mean values for premolars and molars differed significantly. When a comparison was made of preparations performed by students, a significant difference was found between premolars and molars. The same comparison for general practitioners showed a significant difference both for incisors compared with molars and for premolars compared with molars. A wide range was found for the convergence of the axial walls, especially for the preparations performed by general practitioners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1996-01-01