A computerized system to measure interproximal alveolar bone levels in epidemiologic, radiographic investigations: II. Intra-and inter-examiner variation study

Authors

  • Francis R. Wouters Departments of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, and Trollhättan-Vänersborg Hospital, Vänersborg, Sweden
  • Stig Lavstedt Departments of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, and Trollhättan-Vänersborg Hospital, Vänersborg, Sweden
  • Lars Frithiof Departments of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, and Trollhättan-Vänersborg Hospital, Vänersborg, Sweden
  • Per- Östen Söder Departments of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, and Trollhättan-Vänersborg Hospital, Vänersborg, Sweden
  • Leif Helldén Departments of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, and Trollhättan-Vänersborg Hospital, Vänersborg, Sweden
  • Lars Salonen Departments of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, and Trollhättan-Vänersborg Hospital, Vänersborg, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358809004744

Keywords:

Calibration, examiners, computers, periodontitis, marginal, radiography, dental

Abstract

The study was aimed at analyzing intra-and inter-examiner variations in computerized measurement and in non-measurability of alveolar bone level in a cross-sectional, epidemiologic material. At each interproximal tooth surface, alveolar bone height in percentage of root length (B/R) and tooth length (B/T) were determined twice by one examiner and once by a second examiner from ×5-magnified periapical radiographs. The overall intra-and inter-examiner variations in measurement were 2.85% and 3.84% of root length and 1.97% and 2.82% of tooth length, respectively. The variations were different for different tooth groups and for different degrees of severity of marginal periodontitis. The overall proportions of non-measurable tooth surfaces varied with examiner from 32% to 39% and from 43% to 48% of the available interproximal tooth surfaces for B/R and B/T, respectively. With regard to the level of reliability, the computerized method reported is appropriate to cross-sectional, epidemiologic investigations from radiographs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-13