Quality of fixed prosthodontics after 15 years

Authors

  • Per-Olof J. Glantz Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Lund, Malrnö, Sweden; The National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
  • Krister Nilner Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Lund, Malrnö, Sweden; The National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
  • Malcolm D. Jendresen Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Lund, Malrnö, Sweden; The National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
  • Hans Sundberg Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Lund, Malrnö, Sweden; The National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040574

Keywords:

Dental caries, dental materials, denture, partial, fixed, epidemiology, insurance, dental

Abstract

Interviews and/or clinical examinations by means of the California Dental Association quality evaluation system were carried out in a group of persons who had received extensive restorative treatments with fixed partial dentures 15 years before this study. The studied group consisted of 77 persons who agreed to participate from an original group of 150 persons selected at random from the Swedish Dental Insurance System records. Of the original group 20 had died, 17 were not traceable or not able to participate for medical reasons, and 36 declined to participate. Thirty-two per cent of the recorded reconstructions had been lost, and 8% partially lost during the 15-year period. Thirty-five per cent of the reconstructions were rated as Satisfactory, whereas the remaining ones had mixed clinical quality ratings. Failures and Not Acceptable quality ratings were found to be caused mainly by fractures, loss of retention, and/or dental caries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1993-01-01