Need for orthognathic surgery in cleft patients from Northern Finland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v83.40338Keywords:
Cleft lip, cleft palate, cleft lip and palate, orthognathic surgery, Le Fort, adolescent orthodonticsAbstract
Objective: Northern Finland has a unique distribution of clefts compared to the rest of Europe and Finland. This may reflect the need for orthognathic surgery among Northern Finland’s patient pool. The aim of this study was to compare previously operated patients aged 18 years or older with cleft lip, cleft lip and alveolus, cleft lip and palate, cleft palate and to evaluate the need for orthognathic surgery in order to achieve a stable and functional occlusion.
Materials and methods: The study group consisted of all 18-years-old cleft patients treated in the Oulu Cleft Center. The total amount of patients was 110. The patients were compared retrospectively using patients’ hospital records. The majority of patients did not have any cleft-associated syndrome. The need for maxillary or bimaxillary orthognathic or corrective-jaw surgery was evaluated by the Oulu Cleft Team. A descriptive and statistical analysis was used to determine the need for orthognathic surgery according to sex and cleft type.
Results: There were nineteen patients of the total of 110 patients who met the criteria requiring corrective-jaw surgery (17,3%). In total 12 males (25,0%) and 7 females (11,3%) were evaluated for the need of orthognathic surgery. Sixteen of the 19 patients had palatal involvement of the cleft.
Conclusions: The need for orthognathic surgery was greater in the cleft lip palate and cleft palate patient groups compared to cleft lip alveolus or cleft lip groups. This study also found that males from Northern Finland need surgery more often than females.
Downloads
References
Lithovius RH, Ylikontiola LP, Harila V, et al. A descriptive epidemiology study of cleft lip and palate in Northern Finland. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72(5):372–75. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2013.840737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2013.840737
Harila V, Ylikontiola LP, Palola R, et al. Maxillary arch dimensions in cleft infants in Northern Finland. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013; 71 (3–4):930–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.734420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.734420
Schutte BC, Murray, JC. The many faces and factors of orofacial clefts. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8(10):1853–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/8.10.1853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/8.10.1853
Sivertsen Å, Wilcox AJ, Skjaerven R, et al. Familial risk of oral clefts by morphological type and severity: population based cohort study of first degree relatives. BMJ. 2008;336(7641):432–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39458.563611.AE DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39458.563611.AE
Więckowska B, Materna-Kiryluk A, Wiśniewska K, et al. The detection of areas in Poland with an increased prevalence of isolated cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(1):110–17. https://doi.org/10.5604/12321966.1141379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/12321966.1141379
Brito LA, Meira JGC, Kobayashi GS, et al. Genetics and management of the patient with orofacial cleft. Plast Surg Int. 2012;2012:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/782821 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/782821
McDonnell R, Owens M, Delany C, et al. Epidemiology of orofacial clefts in the east of Ireland in the 25-year period 1984–2008. Cleft Pal-ate-Craniofac J. 2014; 51(4):e63–9. https://doi.org/10.1597/11-299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1597/11-299
Rautio J, Somer M, Pettay M, et al. Treatment of cleft lip and palate in Finland. Duodecim [Internet]. 2010 [cited 04-03-2021];126(11):1286–94. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20681351/
Koillinen H, Wong F, Rautio J, et al. Mapping of the second locus for the Van der Woude syndrome to chromosome 1p34. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001;9(10):747–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200713
Heliövaara A, Rautio J. A comparison of craniofacial cephalometric morphology and the later need for orthognathic surgery in 6-year-old cleft children. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2011; 39(3):173–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2010.03.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2010.03.020
Gustafsson C, Heliövaara A, Rautio J, et al. Long-term follow-up of bilateral cleft lip and palate: incidence of speech-correcting surgeries and Fistula formation. Cleft Palate Craniofacial J. 2023;60(10):1241–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221102816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221102816
Ore CD, Schoenbrunner A, Brandel M, et al. Incidence of le fort surgery in a mature cohort of patients with cleft lip and palate. Ann Plastic Surg. 2017;78(5):S199–203. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001049
Meazzini MC, Capello AV, Ventrini F, et al. Long-term follow-up of UCLP patients: surgical and orthodontic burden of care during growth and final orthognathic surgery need. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2015;52(6):688–97. https://doi.org/10.1597/12-211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1597/12-211
Broome M, Herzog G, Hohlfeld J, et al. Influence of the primary cleft palate closure on the future need for orthognathic surgery in unilat-eral cleft lip and palate patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(5):1615–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e3181ef2eed DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181ef2eed
Park HM, Kim PJ, Kim HG, et al. Prediction of the need for orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft Lip and/or palate. J Craniofacial Surg. 2015;26(4):1159–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001605
Eslami S, Faber J, Fateh A, et al. Treatment decision in adult patients with class III malocclusion: surgery versus orthodontics. Prog Orthod. 2018;19(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0218-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0218-0
James JN, Costello BJ, Ruiz RL. Management of cleft lip and palate and cleft orthognathic considerations. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am. 2014;26(4):565–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2014.08.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2014.08.007
Chua HDP, Hgg MB, Cheung LK. Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery-which one is more stable in 5 years? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2010;109(6):803–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.056
Rafal N. Historical outline of orthognatic surgery. Dent Med Prob [Internet]. 2021 [cited 05-13-2021];51(1). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285596552_Historical_Outline_of_Orthognatic_Surgery
Bhatia S, Bocca A, Jones J, et al. Le Fort i advancement osteotomies of 1 cm or more. How safe or stable? Br J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2016;54(3):346–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.09.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.09.025
Sándor GK, Leeper HA, Carmichael RP. Risks and benefits of orthognathic surgery – speech and velopharyngeal function. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am. 1997;9(2):147–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1042-3699(20)30988-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1042-3699(20)30988-2
Schwarz C, Gruner E. Logopaedic findings following advancement of the Maxilla. J Maxillofac Surg. 1976;4(C):40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(76)80007-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(76)80007-0
Watts GD, Antonarakis GS, Forrest CR, et al. Single versus segmental maxillary osteotomies and long-term stability in unilateral cleft lip and palate related malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2014;72(12):2514–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.07.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.07.005
Politis C. Life-threatening haemorrhage after 750 le Fort i osteotomies and 376 SARPE procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;41(6):702–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.02.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.02.015
De Gijt JP, Gül A, Tjoa STH, et al. Follow up of surgically-assisted rapid maxillary expansion after 6.5 years: skeletal and dental effects. Br J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2017;55(1):56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.09.002
Bortolotti F, Solidoro L, Bartolucci ML, et al. Skeletal and dental effects of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Orthod. 2020;42(4): 434–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz057
Gurler G, Kaptan Akar N, Delilbasi C, et al. Skeletal changes following surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME). Eur Oral Res. 2019;94–8. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2018.465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2018.465
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mateusz Podleśny, Leena Ylikontiola, George K. Sándor, Ville Vuollo, Virpi Harila
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica publishes original research papers as well as critical reviews relevant to the diagnosis, epidemiology, health service, prevention, aetiology, pathogenesis, pathology, physiology, microbiology, development and treatment of diseases affecting tissues of the oral cavity and associated structures including papers on cause and effect or explanatory/associative relationships for experimental or observational studies.
