Assessing current clinical eruption stage of mandibular third molars by dental panoramic radiography

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v83.40477

Keywords:

Molar, Third, Radiography, Panoramic, Tooth Eruption, Tooth, Unerupted, Diagnosis, Oral

Abstract

Objective: We examined whether dental panoramic radiography (PAN) can be used to identify the clinical stage of eruption of mandibular third molars at the time of radiological examination.

Materials and methods: Cross-sectional data included records from clinical oral examination and PANs of university students. In the retrospective analysis of 345 mandibular third molars in 189 participants (20% men, 80% women; mean age 20.7 years; standard deviation [SD] ± 0.6), clinical stages of eruption were compared with their radiographic depth in bone, inclination, and root development. Statistics included χ2, Mann-Whitney U tests, and logistic regression.

Results: Significant (p < 0.001) predictor variables for assessing the clinical stage of eruption were radiographic depth in bone and inclination. All teeth radiologically at a depth of the cementoenamel (CE) junction of the neighbouring second molar or deeper were clinically unerupted. Above the CE junction, 80% of vertical and 97% of distoangular teeth were connected to the oral cavity, and 82% of mesioangular and 69% of horizontal teeth were clinically unerupted.

Conclusion: All teeth below or at the CE junction are clinically unerupted. Above the CE junction, stage of eruption should be assessed together with the inclination, but horizontally inclined teeth are recommended to be verified clinically.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

European Commission. Radiation protection 136 [Internet]. Luxembourg: European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology. The safe use of radiographs in dental practice. EC report 136. 2004 [cited 2024 Feb 16]. Available from: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2014-11/136_1.pdf

Flygare L, Ohman A. Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal. Clin Oral Investig. 2008;12(4):291–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0200-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0200-1

Meara DJ. Evaluation of third molars: clinical examination and imaging techniques. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2012;20(2):163–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2012.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2012.07.001

Knutsson K, Brehmer B, Lysell L, et al. Pathoses associated with mandibular third molars subjected to removal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;82(1):10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(96)80371-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80371-4

Almendros-Marqués N, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Influence of lower third molar position on the incidence of preoperative complications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102:725–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.01.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.01.006

Falci SG, de Castro CR, Santos RC, et al. Association between the presence of a partially erupted mandibular third molar and the existence of caries in the distal of the second molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41:1270–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.03.003

Nunn ME, Fish MD, Garcia RI, et al. Retained asymptomatic third molars and risk for second molar pathology. J Dent Res. 2013;92(12):1095–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513509281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513509281

Matzen LH, Schropp L, Spin-Neto R, Wenzel A. Use of cone beam computed tomography to assess significant imaging findings related to mandibular third molar impaction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;124:506–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.07.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.07.007

Galvão EL, da Silveira EM, de Oliveira ES, et al. Association between mandibular third molar position and the occurrence of pericoronitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Oral Biol. 2019;107:104486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.104486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.104486

Niedzielska IA, Drugacz J, Kus N, et al. Panoramic radiographic predictors of mandibular third molar eruption. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102:154–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.003

Ventä I, Turtola L. Changes in the oral health of university students during the first three years of studies. (Abstract in English). Ylioppilaiden terveydenhoitosäätiön tutkimuksia. 2008;44:1–104.

Vesala T, Ekholm M, Ventä I. Is dental panoramic tomography appropriate for all young adults because of third molars? Acta Odontol Scand. 2021;79:1:52–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2020.1776384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2020.1776384

Haavikko K. The formation and the alveolar and clinical eruption of the permanent teeth. An orthopantomographic study. Suom Hammaslaak Toim. 1970;66(3):103–170.

Tuovinen E, Ekholm M, Ventä I. Is the third molar erupting at a younger age than before? Acta Odontol Scand. 2022;80(3):203–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2021.1985167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2021.1985167

Schuurhuis JM, Stokman MA, Witjes MJH, et al. Evidence supporting pre-radiation elimination of oral foci of infection in head and neck cancer patients to prevent oral sequelae. A systematic review. Oral Oncol. 2015;51(3):212–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.11.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.11.017

Spijkervet FKL, Schuurhuis JM, Stokman MA, et al. Should oral foci of infection be removed before the onset of radiotherapy or chemotherapy? Oral Dis. 2021;27(1):7–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.13329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.13329

Abu Eid R, Sawair F, Landini G, Saku T. Age and the architecture of oral mucosa. Age. 2012;34(3):651–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-011-9261-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-011-9261-1

Published

2024-04-23