Onset and progression of dental erosion in a mouse model

Authors

  • Julie Marie Haabeth Brox Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Amela Tulek Nordic Institute of Dental Materials (NIOM AS), Oslo, Norway
  • Amer Sehic Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • Aida Mulic Nordic Institute of Dental Materials (NIOM AS), Oslo, Norway; Department of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
  • Tor Paaske Utheim Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • Qalbi Khan Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Public Health and Sport Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v83.41193

Keywords:

Acidic drinks, Dental enamel, Mouse model, Scanning electron microscopy, Tooth attrition, Tooth erosion

Abstract

Objective: Purpose of this research was to examine the onset, progression and wear rates of dental erosion in an established mouse model.

Material and methods: Dental erosion in mice was experimentally induced, and the acidic effects of cola drink on their teeth after 2, 4 and 6-weeks were closely analysed by scanning electron microscopy. The tooth height and enamel or dentin loss were established. 

Results: The dental erosion on the molars showed clear progression from 2 to 6 weeks. By the 2-week mark, a significant portion of enamel was already eroded, revealing the dentin on the lingual cusps. When adjusted for attritional wear, molars exposed to cola for 2 weeks showed a 35% drop in lingual tooth height compared to controls (533 μm vs. 818 μm). At 4 and 6 weeks, the cola-exposed group continued to display decreased lingual tooth heights by 40% (476 μm vs. 799 μm) and 43% (440 μm vs. 767 μm), respectively.

Conclusion: This study revealed significant acidic effects of cola drink on mouse molars as early as 2 weeks. These findings highlight the challenge of monitoring dental erosion clinically and underscore the importance of early preventive and intervention measures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lussi A, Carvalho TS. Erosive tooth wear: a multifactorial condition of growing concern and increasing knowledge. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1159/000360380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000360380

Zero DT, Lussi A. Erosion – chemical and biological factors of importance to the dental practitioner. Int Dent J. 2005;55(4 Suppl 1):285–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2005.tb00066.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2005.tb00066.x

Shellis RP, Featherstone JD, Lussi A. Understanding the chemistry of dental erosion. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:163–79. https://doi.org/10.1159/000359943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000359943

Barbour ME, Lussi A. Erosion in relation to nutrition and the environment. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:143–54. https://doi.org/10.1159/000359941 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000359941

Mulic A, Vidnes-Kopperud S, Skaare AB, Tveit AB, Young A. Opinions on dental erosive lesions, knowledge of diagnosis, and treatment strategies among Norwegian Dentists: a questionnaire survey. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:716396. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/716396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/716396

Jaeggi T, Lussi A. Prevalence, incidence and distribution of erosion. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:55–73. https://doi.org/10.1159/000360973 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000360973

Sovik JB, Skudutyte-Rysstad R, Tveit AB, Sandvik L, Mulic A. Sour sweets and acidic beverage consumption are risk indicators for dental erosion. Caries Res. 2015;49(3):243–50. https://doi.org/10.1159/000371896 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000371896

Lussi A, Jaeggi T, Zero D. The role of diet in the aetiology of dental erosion. Caries Res. 2004;38 Suppl 1:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1159/000074360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000074360

Hasselkvist A, Johansson A, Johansson AK. A 4 year prospective longitudinal study of progression of dental erosion associated to lifestyle in 13–14 year-old Swedish adolescents. J Dent. 2016 Apr;47:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.02.002

Lussi A, Schaffner M. Progression of and risk factors for dental erosion and wedge-shaped defects over a 6-year period. Caries Res. 2000 Mar-Apr;34(2):182–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000016587

Stenhagen KR, Berntsen I, Odegaard M, Mulic A, Tveit AB. Has the prevalence and severity of dental erosion in Norway changed during the last 30 years? Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Sep;18(3):177–182.

Uhlen MM, Stenhagen KR, Dizak PM, et al. Genetic variation may explain why females are less susceptible to dental erosion. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016 Oct;124(5):426–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12297

Cadwick RG, Mitchell HL, Manton SL, Ward S, Ogston S, Brown R. Maxillary incisor palatal erosion: no correlation with dietary variables? J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2005 Winter;29(2):157–63. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.29.2.g413861067g2g884 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.29.2.g413861067g2g884

Uhlen MM, Mulic A, Holme B, Tveit AB, Stenhagen KR. The Susceptibility to Dental Erosion Differs among Individuals. Caries Res. 2016;50(2):117–23. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000444400

Sorvari R, Kiviranta I. A semiquantitative method of recording experimental tooth erosion and estimating occlusal wear in the rat. Arch Oral Biol. 1988;33(4):217–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(88)90181-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(88)90181-1

Higo T, Mukaisho K, Ling ZQ, et al. An animal model of intrinsic dental erosion caused by gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Oral Dis. 2009 Jul;15(5):360–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01561.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01561.x

Curzon ME, Hefferren JJ. Modern methods for assessing the cariogenic and erosive potential of foods. Br Dent J. 2001 Jul 14;191(1):41–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801087a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801087a

Tulek A, Saeed M, Mulic A, et al. New animal model of extrinsic dental erosion-Erosive effect on the mouse molar teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 2018 Dec;96:137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.08.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.08.013

Tulek A, Mulic A, Refsholt Stenhagen K, et al. Dental erosion in mice with impaired salivary gland function. Acta Odontol Scand. 2020 Jul;78(5):390–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2020.1734234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2020.1734234

Risnes S. Multiangular viewing of dental enamel in the SEM: an apparatus for controlled mechanical specimen preparation. Scand J Dent Res. 1985 Apr;93(2):135–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2020.1734234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1985.tb01321.x

Sorvari R, Pelttari A, Meurman JH. Surface ultrastructure of rat molar teeth after experimentally induced erosion and attrition. Caries Res. 1996;30(2):163–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000262154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000262154

Sorvari R, Kiviranta I, Luoma H. Erosive effect of a sport drink mixture with and without addition of fluoride and magnesium on the molar teeth of rats. Scand J Dent Res. 1988 Jun;96(3):226–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1988.tb01548.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1988.tb01548.x

Sorvari R. Effects of various sport drink modifications on dental caries and erosion in rats with controlled eating and drinking pattern. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1989;85(1):13–20.

ldosari MA, Scaramucci T, Liu SY, Warrick-Polackoff JM, Eckert GJ, Hara AT. Susceptibility of partially desalivated rats to erosive tooth wear by calcium-supplemented beverages. Oral Dis. 2018 Apr;24(3):355–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12740

Bartlett DW, Blunt L, Smith BG. Measurement of tooth wear in patients with palatal erosion. Br Dent J. 1997 Mar 8;182(5):179–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809338

Pintado MR, Anderson GC, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Variation in tooth wear in young adults over a two-year period. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Mar;77(3):313–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70189-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70189-6

Chadwick RG, Mitchell HL. Conduct of an algorithm in quantifying simulated palatal surface tooth erosion. J Oral Rehabil. 2001 May;28(5):450–6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00675.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00675.x

Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res. 1989 Dec;68(12):1752–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680120601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680120601

Rodriguez JM, Austin RS, Bartlett DW. In vivo measurements of tooth wear over 12 months. Caries Res. 2012;46(1):9–15. https://doi.org/10.1159/000334786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000334786

Schlueter N, Tveit AB. Prevalence of erosive tooth wear in risk groups. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:74–98. https://doi.org/10.1159/000359938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000359938

Bartlett DW, Palmer I, Shah P. An audit of study casts used to monitor tooth wear in general practice. Br Dent J. 2005 Aug 13;199(3):143–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4812570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4812570

Stanley HR, Pereira JC, Spiegel E, Broom C, Schultz M. The detection and prevalence of reactive and physiologic sclerotic dentin, reparative dentin and dead tracts beneath various types of dental lesions according to tooth surface and age. J Oral Pathol. 1983 Aug;12(4):257–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1983.tb00338.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1983.tb00338.x

Tronstad L, Langeland K. Effect of attrition on subjacent dentin and pulp. J Dent Res. 1971 Jan-Feb;50(1):1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345710500012101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345710500012101

Sehic A, Risnes S, Khuu C, Khan QES, Osmundsen H. Effects of in vivo transfection with anti-miR-214 on gene expression in murine molar tooth germ. Physiol Genomics. 2011 May 13;43(9):488–98. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00248.2010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00248.2010

Sehic A, Peterkova R, Lesot H, Risnes S. Distribution and structure of the initial dental enamel formed in incisors of young wild-type and Tabby mice. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Dec;117(6):644–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00676.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00676.x

Sehic A, Nirvani M, Risnes S. Incremental lines in mouse molar enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 2013 Oct;58(10):1443–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.06.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.06.013

Lyngstadaas SP, Moinichen CB, Risnes S. Crown morphology, enamel distribution, and enamel structure in mouse molars. Anat Rec. 1998 Mar;250(3):268–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199803)250:3<268::AID-AR2>3.0.CO;2-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199803)250:3<268::AID-AR2>3.0.CO;2-X

Published

2024-09-09