Comparison of accuracy of different dental age estimation methods in Finnish and Turkish populations

Authors

  • Aysima Darıcı Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8536-385X
  • Merih Seval Ölmez Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
  • Hamdi Cem Güngör Division of Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Developmental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, United States
  • Päivi Rajavaara Research Unit of Population Health, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Pohde, Finland
  • Annina Sipola Research Unit of Population Health, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Department  of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Oulu, Oulo, Finland
  • Vuokko Anttonen Professor Emerita, University of Oulu, Oulo, Finland
  • Jari Päkkilä Research Unit of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v83.42434

Keywords:

Dental age, age estimation, Cameriere’s method, Finnish children, Forensic dentistry

Abstract

Objective: The aims of this study were to assess the accuracy of Cameriere’s and Demirjian’s methods in Finnish children, and compare the findings with those of the Turkish children according to dental age.

Material and methods: Dental panoramic tomography (DPT) of children (482 Finnish, 423 Turkish) aged between 5 and 15 years were evaluated. Comparison of mean difference between estimated and chronological age was evaluated. The difference between two means was analysed using paired t-test at 95% confidence interval (CI). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to estimate the correlation between chronological and estimated ages. 

Results: Demirjian’s method resulted in overestimation in all age groups except for 8-year-old girls. Dental age, however, was found to be underestimated with Cameriere’s method in all age groups but 6-year-old girls and boys. In Northern Finnish children, Demirjian’s method was more suitable for boys while Cameriere’s method led to better estimation in girls. When comparing Finnish and Turkish children, differences between dental ages and chronological ages differed significantly in 10-year-old boys and 8-year-old girls with both methods. 

Conclusion: Dental age of Turkish children seems higher than that of Finnish children. There is a significant difference between chronological and dental ages in both populations assessed by both methods. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Cingolani M. Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices in teeth. Int J Legal Med. 2006 Jan;120(1):49–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-005-0047-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-005-0047-9

Mohammed RB, Sanghvi P, Perumalla KK, Srinivasaraju D, Srinivas J, Siva Kalyan U, et al. Accuracy of four dental age estimation methods in southern Indian children. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jan;9(1):Hc01–8. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2015/10141.5495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/10141.5495

Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973 May;45(2):211–27.

Bonthuis M, van Stralen KJ, Verrina E, Edefonti A, Molchanova EA, Hokken-Koelega ACS, et al. Use of national and international growth charts for studying height in European children: development of up-to-date European height-for-age charts. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042506

Natale V, Rajagopalan A. Worldwide variation in human growth and the World Health Organization growth standards: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 8;4(1):e003735. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003735

de Wilde JA, van Dommelen P, van Buuren S, Middelkoop BJ. Height of South Asian children in the Netherlands aged 0–20 years: secular trends and comparisons with current Asian Indian, Dutch and WHO references. Ann Hum Biol. 2015 Jan;42(1):38–44. https://doi.org/10.3109/03014460.2014.926988 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/03014460.2014.926988

Paz Cortés MM, Rojo R, Alía García E, Mourelle Martínez MR. Accuracy assessment of dental age estimation with the Willems, Demirjian and Nolla methods in Spanish children: comparative cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jul 31;20(1):361. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02247-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02247-x

Shen C, Pan J, Yang Z, Mou H, Tao J, Ji F, et al. Applicability of 2 dental age estimation methods to Taiwanese population. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2020 Dec;41(4):269–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000584

Zelic K, Marinkovic N, Milovanovic P, Cameriere R, Djuric M, Nedeljkovic N. Age estimation in children based on open apices measurement in the Serbian population: Belgrade Age Formula (BAF). Ann Hum Biol. 2020 May;47(3):229–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2020.1764621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2020.1764621

Valluri R, Jain Y, Lalitha C, Sajjan P, Ealla KKR, Dantu R, et al. Age estimation in mixed-dentition children, using Cameriere’s European Formula and Demirjian’s Method: a comparative pilot study. J Contemp Dental Pract. 2020 Mar 1;21(3):310–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2756

Pratyusha K, Prasad MG, Radhakrishna AN, Saujanya K, Raviteja NVK, Chandrasekhar S. Applicability of Demirjian’s method and modified Cameriere’s methods for dental age assessment in children. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Feb;11(2):Zc40–3. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2017/21474.9342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/21474.9342

Tilastoteskus. Population according to citizenship, age and sex, 1990–2022. 2024 [cited 1 March 2024]. Available from: https://pxdata.stat.fi/PxWeb/pxweb/en/Maahanmuuttajat_ja_kotoutuminen/Maahanmuuttajat_ja_kotoutuminen__Maahanmuuttajat_ja_kotoutuminen/maakoto_pxt_11vv.px/table/tableViewLayout1/

Sehrawat JS, Singh M. Willems method of dental age estimation in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Forensic Legal Med. 2017 Nov;52:122–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.08.017

Linden J, Widström E, Sinkkonen J. Children and adolescents dental treatment in 2001–2013 in the Finnish public dental service. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0828-z

Pietilä I, Pietilä T, Varrela J, Pirttiniemi P, Alanen P. Trends in Finnish public orthodontic care from the professionals’ perspective. Int J Dent. 2009;2009. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/945074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/945074

Bouwens DG, Cevidanes L, Ludlow JB, Phillips C. Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(1):126–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.05.016

Metsäniitty M. Orensic age assessment in finland, and dental development of Somalis. University of Helsinki; 2019.

Nyström M, Haataja J, Kataja M, Evälahti M, Peck L, Kleemola-Kujala E. Dental maturity in Finnish children, estimated from the development of seven permanent mandibular teeth. Acta Odontol Scand. London. 1986 Aug;44(4):193–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358608997720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358608997720

Pathak HV, Dixit P, Shrigiriwar M, Bardale R. Orthopantomographic evaluation of canine and first premolar using Demirjian’s stages in central India: new approach to forensic age estimation. J Forensic Sci. 2012 Jul;57(4):1082–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02111.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02111.x

Birchler FA, Kiliaridis S, Combescure C, Julku J, Pirttiniemi P, Vazquez L. Dental age assessment on panoramic radiographs: comparison between two generations of young Finnish subjects. J Int Med Res. 2019 Jan;47(1):311–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060518801437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060518801437

Duruk G, Gundogdu Ozdal TP, Duman S. Accuracy of age estimation with Demirjian and Nolla methods in Eastern Turkish children aged 3–17 years old. Eur Oral Res. 2022 May 5;56(2):80–7. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20221057985 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20221057985

Ozveren N, Serindere G, Meric P, Cameriere R. A comparison of the accuracy of Willems’ and Cameriere’s methods based on panoramic radiography. Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Sep;302:109912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109912 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109912

Galić I, Vodanović M, Cameriere R, Nakaš E, Galić E, Selimović E, et al. Accuracy of Cameriere, Haavikko, and Willems radiographic methods on age estimation on Bosnian-Herzegovian children age groups 6–13. Int J Legal Med. 2011 Mar;125(2):315–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0515-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0515-8

Marinkovic N, Milovanovic P, Djuric M, Nedeljkovic N, Zelic K. Dental maturity assessment in Serbian population: a comparison of Cameriere’s European formula and Willems’ method. Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Jul;288:331.e1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.019

Wolf TG, Briseño-Marroquín B, Callaway A, Patyna M, Müller VT, Willershausen I, et al. Dental age assessment in 6- to 14-year old German children: comparison of Cameriere and Demirjian methods. BMC Oral Health. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0315-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0315-8

Lan LM, Yang ZD, Sun SL, Wen D, Kureshi A, Zeye MMJ, et al. Application of Demirjian’s and Cameriere’s method in dental age estimation of 8–16 year old adolescents from Hunan Han Nationality. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Aug;35(4):406–10. https://doi.org/10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2019.04.005

Gannepalli A, Balla SB, Pacha VB, Gandhi Babu DB, Hari Vinay B, Perkari S. Applicability of Cameriere European formula for age estimation of 10–15 years legal threshold in South Indian population. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2019 May-Aug;11(2):78–83. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_72_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_72_19

Mazzilli LEN, Melani RFH, Lascala CA, Palacio LAV, Cameriere R. Age estimation: Cameriere’s open apices methodology accuracy on a southeast Brazilian sample. J Forensic Legal Med. 2018 Aug;58:164–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2018.06.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2018.06.006

Özdemir Tosyalıoğlu FE, Özgür B, Çehreli SB, Arrais Ribeiro, Cameriere R. The accuracy of Cameriere methods in Turkish children: chronological age estimation using developing teeth and carpals and epiphyses of the ulna and radius. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2023 Sep;19(3):372–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-023-00692-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-023-00692-5

Demirjian A, Goldstein H. New systems for dental maturity based on seven and four teeth. Ann Hum Biol. 1976 Sep;3(5):411–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014467600001671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03014467600001671

Varkkola O, Ranta H, Metsäniitty M, Sajantila A. Age assessment by the Greulich and Pyle method compared to other skeletal X-ray and dental methods in data from Finnish child victims of the Southeast Asian Tsunami. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2011 Dec;7(4):311–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-010-9173-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-010-9173-x

Chaillet N, Nyström M, Kataja M, Demirjian A. Dental maturity curves in Finnish children: Demirjian’s method revisited and polynomial functions for age estimation. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49(6):JFS2004211-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2004211

Nyström M, Peck L, Kleemola-Kujala E, Evälahti M,Kataja M. Age estimation in small children: reference values based on counts of deciduous teeth in Finns. Forensic Sci Int. 2000 Jun 5;110(3):179–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00167-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00167-5

Chaillet N, Nyström M, Demirjian A. Comparison of dental maturity in children of different ethnic origins: international maturity curves for clinicians. J Forensic Sci. 2005 Sep;50(5):1164–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2005020

Celik S, Zeren C, Celikel A, et al. Applicability of the Demirjian method for dental assessment of southern Turkish children. J Forensic legal Med. 2014 Jul;25:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.006

Nyström M, Ranta R, Kataja M, Silvola H. Comparisons of dental maturity between the rural community of Kuhmo in northeastern Finland and the city of Helsinki. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1988;16(4):215–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1988.tb01757.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1988.tb01757.x

Altunsoy M, Nur BG, Akkemik O, Ok E, Evcil MS. Applicability of the Demirjian method for dental age estimation in western Turkish children. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015 Feb;73(2):121–5. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.956333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.956333

Briffa, K., Busuttil Dougall, N., Galea, J., Mifsud, D., & Camilleri, S. Chronologic and dental ages of Maltese schoolchildren: a pilot study. Malta Med J. 2005;17(4), 31-35

Peiris TS, Roberts GJ, Prabhu N. Dental Age Assessment: a comparison of 4- to 24-year-olds in the United Kingdom and an Australian population. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009 Sep;19(5):367–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263x.2009.00984.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2009.00984.x

Teivens A, Mörnstad H. A comparison between dental maturity rate in the Swedish and Korean populations using a modified Demirjian method. J Forensic Odonto-stomatol. 2001 Dec;19(2):31–5.

Cruz-Landeira A, Linares-Argote J, Martínez-Rodríguez M, Rodríguez-Calvo MS, Otero XL, Concheiro L. Dental age estimation in Spanish and Venezuelan children. Comparison of Demirjian and Chaillet’s scores. Int J Legal Med. 2010 Mar;124(2):105–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0380-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0380-5

Drusini AG, Toso, O., Ranzato, C. The coronal pulp cavity index: a biomarker for age determination in human adults. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1997;103(3):353–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(199707)103:3%3C353::aid-ajpa5%3E3.0.co;2-r DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199707)103:3<353::AID-AJPA5>3.0.CO;2-R

Gulsahi A, Tirali RE, Cehreli SB, De Luca S, Ferrante L, Cameriere R. The reliability of Cameriere’s method in Turkish children: a preliminary report. Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Apr;249:319.e1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.01.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.01.031

Rivera M, De Luca S, Aguilar L, Palacio LAV, Galić I, Cameriere R. Measurement of open apices in tooth roots in Colombian children as a tool for human identification in asylum and criminal proceedings. J Forensic Legal Med. 2017 May;48:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.03.005

Cugati N, Kumaresan R, Srinivasan B, Karthikeyan P. Dental age estimation of growing children by measurement of open apices: a Malaysian formula. J Forensic Dental Sci. 2015 Sep-Dec;7(3):227–31. https://doi.org/10.4103%2F0975-1475.172445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.172445

Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Liversidge HM, Prieto JL, Brkic H. Accuracy of age estimation in children using radiograph of developing teeth. Forensic Sci Int. 2008 Apr 7;176(2–3):173–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.09.001

Hostiuc S, Diaconescu I, Rusu MC, Negoi I. Age Estimation Using the Cameriere Methods of Open Apices: A Meta-Analysis. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 23;9(2):237. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020237

NykaÈnen R, Espeland L, Kvaal SI, Krogstad O. Validity of the Demirjian method for dental age estimation when applied to Norwegian children. Acta Odontol Scand. 1998;56(4):238–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016359850142862 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016359850142862

Halilah T, Khdairi N, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Bartzela T. Age estimation in 5–16-year-old children by measurement of open apices: North German formula. Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Dec;293:103.e1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.09.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.09.022

Jayaraman J, Wong HM, King NM, Roberts GJ. The French-Canadian data set of Demirjian for dental age estimation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Forensic legal Med. 2013 Jul;20(5):373–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2013.03.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2013.03.015

Bundak R, Darendeliler F, Günöz H, Baş F, Saka N, Neyzi O. Puberty and pubertal growth in healthy Turkish girls: no evidence for secular trend. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2008;1(1):8–14. https://doi.org/10.4008/jcrpe.v1i1.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4008/jcrpe.v1i1.16

Kantero R-L, Widbolm O. II The age of menarche in Finnish girls in 1969. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1971;50(sup14):7–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016347109155076

Published

2024-11-22