Reviewer’s dilemma when facing a ‘voluminous’ manuscript

Authors

  • Shigeki Matsubara Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koga Red Cross Hospital, Koga, Ibaraki, Japan; Medical Examination Center, Ibaraki Western Medical Center, Chikusei, Ibaraki, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v84.43808

Abstract

N/A

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Holmstrup P. The peer review process: Growing problem in recruiting qualified reviewers. Acta Odontol Scand. 2024;83:642. https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v83.42370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v83.42370

Hadler-Olsen E. Why do researchers decline reviewer invitations? Response to the editorial ‘The Peer Review Process: Growing Problem in Recruiting Qualified Reviewers’. Acta Odontol Scand. 2025;84:76–7. https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v84.42853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v84.42853

Matsubara S, Matsubara D. A checklist confirming whether a manuscript for submission adheres to the fundamentals of academic writing: a proposal. JMA J. 2024;7(2):276–8. https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2023-0201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2023-0201

Matsubara S. Letters generated by ChatGPT: Author who? J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024;50(7):1250–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.15948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.15948

Downloads

Published

2025-06-10

Issue

Vol. 84: (2025) Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Section

Letter to the Editor

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Shigeki Matsubara

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.