Analysis of changes in ABT, ABH and ABA after orthodontic treatment of adult bimaxillary protrusion

Authors

  • Hongrui Sun Department of Orthodontics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin City, Heilongjiang Province, China
  • Lin Tang Department of Orthodontics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin City, Heilongjiang Province, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v84.44123

Keywords:

Orthodontic treatment, bimaxillary protrusion, alveolar bone thickness, alveolar bone area

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the changes in alveolar bone thickness (ABT), the height of the enamel bone border-alveolar ridge apex (ABH), and alveolar bone area (ABA) of the labial and palatal sides of the maxillary incisor region after orthodontic treatment of adult bimaxillary protrusion.

Methods: Ninety-eight adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion who underwent orthodontic treatment in our hospital between November 2023 and November 2024 were clinically selected for retrospective study, and patient data were obtained from the medical record system, comparing the widths of the intercuspal space between the cuspids, the width of the space between the first premolar teeth, the width of the space between the second premolar teeth, the convexity of the anterior teeth (UI-SN, UI-NA), and the lip and palate of maxillary incisor region before and after treatment. ABT, ABH, and ABA changes.

Results: Comparison of intercuspal width and MP-SN levels before and after treatment in all patients showed no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). The intercuspal width of the first premolar, intercuspal width of the second premolar, UI-SN and MP-SN were higher than those before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The labial cervical, labial mid-root, and labial apical ABT levels of maxillary mesial incisors and lateral incisors were higher than those before treatment, and the palatal cervical, palatal mid-root, and palatal apical ABT levels were lower than those before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the comparison of labial ABH levels of mesial incisors and lateral incisors before and after treatment (P > 0.05); the levels of palatal ABH of mesial incisors and palatal ABH of lateral incisors were higher than those before treatment, and the levels of palatal ABA of mesial incisors and palatal ABH of lateral incisors were lower than those before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Orthodontic treatment is effective in adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion, but significant resorption of the alveolar bone on the palatal side of the incisal region occurs after treatment, reducing the amount of alveolar bone in the entire incisal region. Therefore, the long-term effects on periodontal tissues need to be paid attention to.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yu X, Duan X, Zhi C, Jiang Y, Chen Z, Zhang C. Orthodontic treatment of traumatically avulsed maxillary central incisors with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion in an adult female: a case report. BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 8;23(1):468. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03123-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03123-7

Cheng J, Zhang D, Xie LL, Wang P, Li J, Hao W. [Incidence and risk factors of temporomandibular joint disorders in patients with bimaxillary protrusion after orthodontic treatment]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2021 Aug;30(4):439-443.

Liao YF, Chen YF, Chang CS, Lu TC, Chen YA, Yao CF,et al.Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach for Correction of Dentofacial Deformity in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Jan 1;153(1):173-183. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010451

Takagi T, Shimizu S, Tanaka E. Surgical orthodontic treatment of skeletal mandibular protrusion with multiple impacted ankylosed teeth treated with alveolar corticotomy. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021,22(4):412–21. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3071

Yasumura T, Kashiwagi Y, Katada H, Nishii Y. Extraction of Maxillary Central Incisors with Short Roots for Orthodontic Treatment of Maxillary Protrusion and Open Bite. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2020 Dec 16;61(4):255-264. https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.2020-0016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.2020-0016

Chen HH, Chen G, Feng GY, Wang XJ, Xu TM, Su H. Orthodontic Treatment of an Adult Maxillomandibular Protrusion Case with Impacted Mandibular Second Molars Using the Physiologic Anchorage Spee-wire System: a Case Report. Chin J Dent Res. 2024 Dec 6;27(4):333-343.

Oueis R, Waite PD, Wang J, Kau CH. Orthodontic-Orthognathic Management of a patient with skeletal class II with bimaxillary protrusion, complicated by vertical maxillary excess: A multi-faceted case report of difficult treatment management issues. Int Orthod. 2020 Mar;18(1):178-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2019.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2019.09.002

Shen CH, Hung TY, Wang M, Chang YC, Fang CY. Utilizing virtual surgical planning and orthognathic surgery to correct severe facial asymmetry without orthodontic treatment. J Dent Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):647-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.07.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.07.015

Lamani E, Alkadri SA, Christou T, Holmes J, Kau CH. Esthetic considerations in an orthodontic-orthognathic patient with Class III skeletal malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 May;161(5):727-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.12.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.12.027

Wang X, Zhao X, Song G, Niu J, Xu T. Machine Learning-Based Evaluation on Craniodentofacial Morphological Harmony of Patients After Orthodontic Treatment. Front Physiol. 2022 May 9;13:862847. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.862847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.862847

Lazaridis K, Athanasiou AE, Knösel M, Papadopoulos MA. Color changes of maxillary and mandibular incisors following surgical orthodontic treatment : A prospective controlled clinical pilot study. J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Mar;83(2):99-107. English. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00288-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00288-0

Kim MS, Lim SH, Jeong SR, Park JH. Maxillary molar intrusion and transverse decompensation to enable mandibular single-jaw surgery with rotational setback and transverse shift for a patient with mandibular prognathism and asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Jun;157(6):818-831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.02.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.02.022

Lu J, Wang Z, Zhang H, Xu W, Zhang C, Yang Y, et al. Bone Graft Materials for Alveolar Bone Defects in Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2022 Feb;28(1):35-51. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2020.0212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0212

Xu H, Zhang S, Sathe AA, Jin Z, Guan J, Sun W, et al. CCR2+ Macrophages Promote Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Alveolar Bone Remodeling. Front Immunol. 2022 Feb 4;13:835986. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.835986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.835986

Kamei H, Ishii T, Nishii Y. Semaphorin 3A regulates alveolar bone remodeling on orthodontic tooth movement. Sci Rep. 2022,12(1):9243. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13217-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13217-x

Chung CJ, Jang W, Piers C, Lee DW, Hwang S, Kim KH, et al. Differential alveolar bone modeling after orthodontic retraction. J Am Dent Assoc. 2019 Apr;150(4):313-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2018.12.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2018.12.029

Miao Y, Chang YC, Tanna N, Almer N, Chung CH, Zou M,et al. Impact of Frontier Development of Alveolar Bone Grafting on Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jun 30;10:869191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.869191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.869191

Gupta S, Singh VK, Pandey S, Singh S, Jaiswal A, Hawaldar C. 3D assessment of alveolar bone alterations in orthodontic movement among Indians. Bioinformation. 2023 Jun 30;19(6):764-769. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630019764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630019764

Gong X, Sun S, Yang Y, Huang X, Gao X, Jin A, et al. Osteoblastic STAT3 Is Crucial for Orthodontic Force Driving Alveolar Bone Remodeling and Tooth Movement. J Bone Miner Res. 2023 Jan;38(1):214-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4744

Pop SI, Cerghizan D, Mițariu L, Jánosi KM, D’Andrea A. CBCT Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Change and Root Resorption after Orthodontic Treatment: A Retrospective Study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 13;14(16):1757. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14161757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14161757

Montanha-Andrade K, Ferreira PP, DE Sena ACVP, Cury PR, Crusoé-Rebello IM. Tomographic diagnosis of alveolar bone coverage impact in orthodontic planning: cross-sectional study. Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 Oct 7;29(5):e242446. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.29.5.e242446.oar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.29.5.e242446.oar

Ramos AL, Dos Santos MC, de Almeida MR, et al. Bone dehiscence formation during orthodontic tooth movement through atrophic alveolar ridges. Angle Orthod. 2020,90(3):321–9. https://doi.org/10.2319/063019-443.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/063019-443.1

Satomi K, Nishimura K, Igarashi K. Semaphorin 3A protects against alveolar bone loss during orthodontic tooth movement in mice with periodontitis. J Periodontal Res. 2022,57(5):991–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.13038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.13038

Jiang Y, Guan Y, Lan Y, Chen S, Li T, Zou S, et al. Mechanosensitive Piezo1 in Periodontal Ligament Cells Promotes Alveolar Bone Remodeling During Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Front Physiol. 2021 Nov 22;12:767136. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.767136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.767136

Luo N, Chen Y, Li L, Wu Y, Dai H, Zhou J. Multivariate analysis of alveolar bone dehiscence and fenestration in anterior teeth after orthodontic treatment: A retrospective study. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Apr;27(2):287-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12726

Rizk M, Niederau C, Florea A, Kiessling F, Morgenroth A, Mottaghy FM, et al, Craveiro RB. Periodontal ligament and alveolar bone remodeling during long orthodontic tooth movement analyzed by a novel user-independent 3D-methodology. Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 14;13(1):19919. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47386-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47386-0

Yang CYM, Atsawasuwan P, Viana G, Tozum TF, Elshebiny T, Palomo JM,et al. Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of maxillary anterior alveolar bone remodelling in extraction and non-extraction orthodontic cases using stable extra-alveolar reference. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023 May;26(2):265-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12609

Kim SJ, Ha YD, Kim E, Jang W, Hwang S, Nguyen T, et al. Dynamics of alveolar bone healing after the removal of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices. J Periodontal Res. 2019 Aug;54(4):388-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.12640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.12640

Xu B, Yang K. Changes in alveolar bone structure during orthodontic tooth movement in adolescent and adult rats: a microcomputed tomography study. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023,26(4):568–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12646

Kobylyanskyy O, Schwarz L, Rausch MA, Kobylyanska A, Andrukhov O, Rausch-Fan X. Changes in the alveolar bone morphology among different patterns of incisor inclination during the alignment phase in orthodontic treatment without premolar extraction. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Aug;27(4):645-655. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12781 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12781

Published

2025-10-22