Immediate or delayed direct restoration does not significantly influence additional endodontic treatments and 5-year tooth survival of first molars

Authors

  • Sara Olsson Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Dental Research Department, Public Dental Health Service, Örebro, Sweden https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1220-0665
  • Maria Pigg Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7989-1541
  • Jesper Gustavsson Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
  • Emil Ekblom Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
  • Helena Fransson Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4290-2283

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v84.44804

Keywords:

apicoectomy, dental restoration, permanent, endodontics, tooth extraction, treatment outcome

Abstract

Objective: In vitro leakage studies suggest that temporary restorations only provide a short-term seal. However, it remains unclear whether the clinical outcome is impacted by the time elapsing between the completion of a root canal treatment (RCT) and the placement of a direct permanent coronal restoration. The aim was to investigate any time-dependent difference in frequencies of endodontic orthograde retreatment, apical surgery and extractions during the subsequent 5 years following root filling of first molars restored with a direct restoration depending on immediate or delayed time between completion of RCT and placement of a direct restoration.

Material and methods: Data from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency was collected. In 2009, 50,314 direct restorations were registered after RCT of the first molars in individuals aged 20 years or older. The teeth were divided into five time intervals depending on time from completion of root filling to placement of direct restoration for comparisons of frequencies of orthograde retreatment, apical surgery and extractions, during the following 5 years.

The time interval categories were compared using Pearson’s Chi-square test.

Results: No statistically significant time-dependent differences in registrations were found for orthograde retreatment (p = 0.089), with or without apical surgery (p = 0.161) and with or without extraction (p = 0.737).

Conclusion: The time elapsed from the completion of RCT and the placement of a direct restoration did not affect the 5-year outcome of the RCT.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dawson VS, Petersson K, Wolf E, Åkerman S. Periapical status of root-filled teeth restored with composite, amalgam, or full crown restorations: a cross-sectional study of a Swedish adult population. J Endod. 2016;42(9):1326–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.​2016.06.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.06.008

Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Carter B, Nasser M, Alrowaili EF. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(9):CD009109. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009109.pub3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009109.pub3

Fransson H, Dawson VS, Frisk F, Bjørndal L, EndoReCo, Kvist T. Survival of root-filled teeth in the Swedish adult population. J Endod. 2016;42(2):216–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.11.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.11.008

Mannocci F, Bitter K, Sauro S, Ferrari P, Austin R, Bhuva B. Present status and future directions: the restoration of root filled teeth. Int Endod J. 2022;55(Suppl. 4):1059–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13796

Imura N, Otani SM, Campos MJ, Jardim Júnior EG, Zuolo ML. Bacterial penetration through temporary restorative materials in root-canal-treated teeth in vitro. Int Endod J. 1997;30(6):381–5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1997.00100.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb00728.x

Balto H. An assessment of microbial coronal leakage of temporary filling materials in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 2002;28(11):​762–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200211000-00004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200211000-00004

Madarati A, Rekab MS, Watts DC, Qualtrough A. Time-dependence of coronal seal of temporary materials used in endodontics. Aust Endod J. 2008;34(3):89–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00079.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00079.x

Pratt I, Aminoshariae A, Montagnese TA, Williams KA, Khalighinejad N, Mickel A. Eight-year retrospective study of the critical time lapse between root canal completion and crown placement: its influence on the survival of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 2016;42(11):1598–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.006

Thyvalikakath T, LaPradd M, Siddiqui Z, Duncan WD, Eckert G, Medam JK, et al. Root canal treatment survival analysis in National Dental PBRN Practices. J Dent Res. 2022;101(11):1328–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345221093936 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345221093936

León-López M, Cabanillas-Balsera D, Martín-González J, Montero-Miralles P, Saúco-Márquez JJ, Segura-Egea JJ. Prevalence of root canal treatment worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2022;55(11):1105–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13822

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD

Lynch CD, Burke FM, Ní Ríordáin R, Hannigan A. The influence of coronal restoration type on the survival of endodontically treated teeth. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004;12(4):171–6.

Wrangstål L, Pigg M, Almutairi N, Fransson H. A critical look at outcome measures: comparison between four dental research journals by use of a hierarchical model. Int Endod J. 2024;57(2):119–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14011

El Karim I, Duncan HF, Cushley S, Nagendrababu V, Kirkevang L-L, Kruse CL, et al. An international consensus study to identify ‘what’ outcomes should be included in a core outcome set for endodontic treatments (COSET) for utilization in clinical practice and research. Int Endod J. 2024;57(3):270–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14008

Olsson S, Jonsson Sjögren J, Pigg M, Fransson H, Eliasson A, EndoReCo, et al. Interventions in root-filled teeth identified in general dental practice: a 6-year longitudinal observational study. Int Endod J. 2024;57(9):1212–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14079

Chen SC, Chueh LH, Hsiao CK, Tsai MY, Ho SC, Chiang CP. An epidemiologic study of tooth retention after nonsurgical endodontic treatment in a large population in Taiwan. J Endod. 2007;33(3):226–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.022

Lumley PJ, Lucarotti PS, Burke FJ. Ten-year outcome of root fillings in the General Dental Services in England and Wales. Int Endod J. 2008;41(7):577–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.​2008.01402.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01402.x

Yee K, Bhagavatula P, Stover S, Eichmiller F, Hashimoto L, MacDonald S, et al. Survival rates of teeth with primary endodontic treatment after core/post and crown placement. J Endod. 2018;44(2):220–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.034

Published

2025-10-10