Timing of dental development in relation to the treatment of maxillary canines: a retrospective register-based study

Authors

  • Jenni Ristaniemi Oral Development and Orthodontics, Research Unit of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  • Eeva Melaluoto Oral Development and Orthodontics, Research Unit of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  • Jenni Iivari Oral Development and Orthodontics, Research Unit of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  • Paula Paula Pesonen Infrastructure for Population Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  • Raija Lähdesmäki Oral Development and Orthodontics, Research Unit of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Medical Research Center Oulu (MRC Oulu), Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v84.45203

Keywords:

dental age, headgear, human, interceptive treatment, mixed dentition

Abstract

Objective: To describe differences in the dental age of Finnish children with the mixed stage of dentition in relation to the treatment provided for the permanent maxillary canines.

Material and methods: This retrospective register-based study was based on 1,332 cross-sectional dental panoramic tomographs (DPTs) for children with a chronological age of 8.5–10.5 years together with longitudinal information on the eruption and treatment of 1,817 maxillary canines in the same children. The treatments were categorized into early (interceptive treatment and early headgear) and late treatment (orthodontic treatment and treatment for crowding) groups. Dental age was assessed by Demirjian’s dental maturity method and grouped into delayed (≤ –1 year), normal (> –1 and < +1), and advanced (≥ +1 year) relative to children’s chronological age. Results were performed using Pearson’s chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and multinominal logistic regression models.

Results: Normal dental age at the time of the DPT was detected most often in the children in all studied treatment groups. Delayed dental age was detected more often in the children in the early treatment group and advanced dental age in the late treatment group (p = 0.002). The mean dental age of the girls with early treated canine(s) lagged significantly behind that of the girls in the groups that received no treatment (–0.43 years, p = 0.004) or late treatment (–0.45 years, p = 0.026). Delayed dental age was detected in 28.1% of the interceptively treated canines, leading to an association between delayed dental age and interceptive treatment (odds ratio 3.99, 95% confidence interval 1.84–8.67).

Conclusions: Association was found between delayed dental age and interceptive treatment of a maxillary canine. Because of variations in dental age within the same age group, the timing of treatment plays a key role in order to achieve early treatment options for children’s erupting maxillary canines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Broadbent BH. Ontogenic development of occlusion. Angle Orthod. 1941;11:223–41.

Coulter J, Richardson A. Normal eruption of the maxillary canine quantified in three dimensions. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19(2):171–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/19.2.171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/19.2.171

Becker A, Chaushu S. Etiology of maxillary canine impaction: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Ortho. 2015;148(4):557–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.013

Ericson S, Kurol PJ. Resorption of incisors after ectopic eruption of maxillary canines: a CT study. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:415–23.

Hadler-Olsen S, Pirttiniemi P, Kerosuo H, Limchaichana NB, Pesonen P, Kallio-Pulkkinen S, et al. Root resorptions related to ectopic and normal eruption of maxillary canine teeth – a 3D study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73(8):609–15. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2015.1020339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2015.1020339

Haavikko K. The formation and the alveolar and clinical eruption of the permanent teeth. An orthopantomographic study. Suom Hammaslaak Toim. 1970;66:103–70.

Demirjian A, Levesque GY. Sexual differences in dental development and prediction of emergence. J Dent Res. 1980;59:1110–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345800590070301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345800590070301

Chaillet N, Nystrom M, Kataja M, Demirjian A. Dental maturity curves in Finnish children: Demirjian’s method revisited and polynomial functions for age estimation. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49(6):1324–31. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2004211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2004211

Pahkala R, Pahkala A, Laine T. Eruption pattern of permanent teeth in a rural community in northeastern Finland. Acta Odontol Scand. 1991;49(6):341–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359109005930 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359109005930

Koch G, Kreiborg S, Andreasen JO. Eruption and shedding of teeth. In: Koch G, Poulsen S, Espelid I, Haubek D, editors. Pediatric dentistry: a clinical approach. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell; 2017. p. 40–54.

Ericson S, Kurol J. Early treatment of palatally erupting maxillary canines by extraction of the primary canines. Eur J Orthod. 1988;10(4):283–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/10.4.283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/10.4.283

Power SM, Short MB. An investigation into the response of palatally displaced canines to the removal of deciduous canines and an assessment of factors contributing to favourable eruption. Br J Orthod. 1993;20(3):215–23. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.20.3.215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.20.3.215

Naoumova J, Kurol J, Kjellberg H. Extraction of the deciduous canine as an interceptive treatment in children with palatal displaced canines – part I: shall we extract the deciduous canine or not? Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(2):209–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju040

Lövgren ML, Dahl O, Uribe P, Ransjö M, Westerlund A. Prevalence of impacted maxillary canines-an epidemiological study in a region with systematically implemented interceptive treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41(5):454–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz056

Kerosuo H, Väkiparta M, Nyström M, Heikinheimo K. The seven-year outcome of an early orthodontic treatment strategy. J Dent Res. 2008;87(6):584–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700604

Keski-Nisula K, Hernesniemi R, Heiskanen M, Keski-Nisula L, Varrela J. Orthodontic intervention in the early mixed dentition: a prospective, controlled study on the effects of the eruption guidance appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(2):254–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.039

Pirttiniemi P, Kantomaa T, Mäntysaari R, Pykäläinen A. The effects of early headgear treatment on dental arches and craniofacial morphology: an 8 year report of a randomized study. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27(5):429–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji025

Silvola AS, Arvonen P, Julku J, Lähdesmäki R, Kantomaa T, Pirttiniemi P, et al. Early headgear effects on the eruption pattern of the maxillary canines. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(3):540–5. https://doi.org/10.2319/021108-83.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/021108-83.1

Hadler-Olsen S, Pirttiniemi P, Kerosuo H, Sjögren A, Pesonen P, Julku J, et al. Does headgear treatment in young children affect the maxillary canine eruption path? Eur J Orthod. 2018;40(6):583–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjy013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjy013

Bazargani F, Magnuson A, Dolati A, Lennartsson B. Palatally displaced maxillary canines: factors influencing duration and cost of treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35(3):310–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr143

Rozylo-Kalinowska I, Kolasa-Raczka A, Kalinowski P. Dental age in patients with impacted maxillary canines related to the position of the impacted teeth. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(5):492–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq123

Lövgren ML, Ransjö M, Uribe P, Westerlund A. Dental age in children with impacted maxillary canines. Acta Odontol Scand. 2021;79(4):289–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2020.1843189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2020.1843189

Becker A, Chaushu S. Dental age in maxillary canine ectopia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117(6):657–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70174-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70174-0

Naser DH, Abu Alhaija ES, Al-Khateeb SN. Dental age assessment in patients with maxillary canine displacement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140(6):848–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.04.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.04.027

Sajnani A, King N. Dental age of children and adolescents with impacted maxillary canines. J Orofac Orthop. 2012;73(5):359–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-012-0106-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-012-0106-z

Mitchell L. Management of the developing dentition. In: Littlewood SJ, Mitchell L, editors. An introduction to orthodontics. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019. p. 22–35.

Ristaniemi J, Karjalainen T, Kujasalo K, Rajala W, Pesonen P, Lähdesmäki R. Radiological features and treatment of erupting maxillary canines in relation to the occurrence of dental developmental abnormalities. Acta Odontol Scand. 2024;83:197–203. https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v83.40488 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v83.40488

Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973;45(2):211–27.

Demirjian A, Goldstein H. New systems for dental maturity based on seven and four teeth. Ann Hum Biol. 1976;3(5):411–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014467600001671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03014467600001671

Published

2025-12-29