Fluoridated milk is effective in prevention of enamel caries in adolescents: a randomised trial

Authors

  • Madeleine Rohlin Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
  • Jessica Neilands Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
  • Julia R. Davies Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
  • Per-Erik Isberg Department of Statistics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Claes Wickström Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
  • Gunnel Svensäter Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v84.45271

Keywords:

dental caries, radiography, bitewing, disease progression, classification, fluoridation, follow-up studies

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether low daily doses of fluoridated milk, as an adjunct to oral hygiene routines with fluoridated toothpaste, can prevent caries development in enamel and dentine in adolescents.

Material and methods: Adolescents (mean age 13 years) at three dental clinics in Sweden were enrolled to a randomised clinical trial (RCT) including baseline and 2-year follow-up examinations. The intervention group consumed milk supplemented with fluoride (0.75–1.0 mg) daily, while the control group consumed milk with water. Caries lesion development was assessed visually in line with the international caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS), except for proximal surfaces of premolars and molars which were assessed using a radiological classification system. Outcome measures were decayed, missing and filled surfaces (DMFS) increment, caries lesion arrest and progression.

Results: Eighty seven participants in the intervention group and 72 in the control group completed the study. The intervention reduced the incidence of DMFS increment for enamel lesions, but not for dentine lesions. The degree of caries lesion arrest in outer enamel was higher in the intervention group compared to the control group, whereas caries lesion progression was lower in the intervention group.

Conclusion: Fluoride exerts an effect on caries lesions in the outer enamel, and fluoridated milk thus can be beneficial to adolescents with such lesions.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT06684405.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wen PYF, Chen MX, Zhong YJ, Dong QQ, Wong HM. Global burden and inequality of dental caries, 1990 to 2019. J Dent Res. 2022;101(4):392–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345211056247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345211056247

Skeie MS, Sen A, Dahllöf G, Natland Fagerhaug T, Høvik H, Klock K. Dental caries at enamel and dentine level among European adolescents – a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):620. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02631-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02631-2

Buzalaf MAR, Pessan JP, Honório HM, ten Cate JM. Mechanisms of action of fluoride for caries control. Monogr Oral Sci. 2011;22:97–114. https://doi.org/10.1159/000325151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000325151

ten Cate JM, Buzalaf MAR. Fluoride mode of action: once there was an observant dentist. J Dent Res. 2019;98(7):725–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519831604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519831604

Rošin-Grget K, Peroš K, Šutej I, Bašić K. The cariostatic mechanisms of fluoride. Acta Med Acad. 2013;42(2):179–88. https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.85 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.85

Yeung CA, Chong LY, Glenny AM. Fluoridated milk for preventing dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(9):CD003876. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003876.pub4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003876.pub3

Hamilton IR, Bowden GHW. Fluoride effects on oral bacteria. In: Fejerskov O, Ekstrand J, Burt BA, editors. Fluoride in dentistry. 2nd ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1996. p. 230–51.

Marquis RE, Clock SA, Mota-Meira M. Fluoride and organic weak acids as modulators of microbial physiology. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003;26(5):493–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2003.tb00627.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2003.tb00627.x

Van Loveren C. Antimicrobial activity of fluoride and its in vivo importance: identification of research questions. Caries Res. 2001;35(Suppl. 1):S65–70. https://doi.org/10.1159/000049114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000049114

López-López A, Mira A. Shifts in composition and activity of oral biofilms after fluoride exposure. Microb Ecol. 2020;80(3):729–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-020-01531-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-020-01531-8

Bánóczy J, Rugg-Gunn A, Woodward M. Milk fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries. Acta Med Acad. 2013;42(2):156–67. https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.83 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.80

Cagetti MG, Campus G, Milia E, Lingström P. A systematic review on fluoridated food in caries prevention. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71(3–4):381–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.690447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.690447

Bian JY, Wang WH, Wang WJ, Rong WS, Lo EC. Effect of fluoridated milk on caries in primary teeth: 21-month results. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31(4):241–5. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00048.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00048.x

Stecksén-Blicks C, Sjöström I, Twetman S. Effect of long-term consumption of milk supplemented with probiotic lactobacilli and fluoride on dental caries and general health in preschool children: a cluster-randomized study. Caries Res. 2009;43(5):374–81. https://doi.org/10.1159/000235581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000235581

Stephen KW, Boyle IT, Campell D, McNee S, Boyle P. Five-year double-blind fluoridated milk study in Scotland. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1984;12(4):223–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1984.tb01444.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1984.tb01444.x

Ketley CE, West JL, Lennon MA. The use of school milk as a vehicle for fluoride in Knowsley, UK; an evaluation of effectiveness. Community Dent Health. 2003;20(2):83–8.

Pakhomov G, Ivanova K, Moller I, Vrabcheva M. The caries reducing effect of a community-based milk fluoridation project in Bulgaria. J Dent Res. 1993;72(Suppl 1):S109.

Maslak EE, Afonina IV, Kchmizova TG, Litovkina LS, Luneva NA. The effect of a milk fluoridation project in Volgograd. Caries Res. 2004;38:377.

Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(8):e1–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004

Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, et al. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35(3):170–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00347.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00347.x

Senneby A, Elfvin M, Stebring-Franzon C, Rohlin M. A novel classification system for assessment of approximal caries lesion progression in bitewing radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(5):20160039. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160039

Pitts NB, Stamm JW. International consensus workshop on caries clinical trials (ICW-CCT) – final consensus statements: agreeing where the evidence leads. J Dent Res. 2004;83:C125–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408301s27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408301s27

Ismail A. Diagnostic levels in dental public health planning. Caries Res. 2004;38(3):199–203. https://doi.org/10.1159/000077755.24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000077755

Havsed K, Hänsel Petersson G, Isberg, PE, Pigg M, Svensäter G, Foresight Research Consortium, et al. Multivariable prediction models of caries increment: a systematic review and critical appraisal. Syst Rev. 2023;12:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02298-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02298-y

Norman GR, Coblenz CL, Brooks LR, Babcooc CJ. Expertise in visual diagnosis: a review of the literature. Acad Med 1992;67(Suppl. 10):S78–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199210000-00045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199210000-00045

Dore KL, Brooks LR, Weaver B, Norman GR. Influence of familiar features on diagnosis: instantiated features in an applied setting. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2012;18(1):109–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026539

Guyatt GH, Mills EJ, Elbourne D. In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter. PLoS Med. 2008;5(1):e4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050004

Published

2025-12-29