The effect of age on third molar extraction difficulty: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v85.45308Keywords:
Molar, third, tooth extraction, primary health care, age group, surgery, oralAbstract
Objective: This study aimed to clarify whether third molar extraction becomes more difficult as the patient ages. Previous research results on the topic are contradictory.
Materials and methods: All 12,649 third molar extractions in Helsinki’s primary care during 2016 were retrieved from electronic records using treatment codes. The primary outcome was extraction difficulty, classified as simple (forceps) or surgical (raising a flap). The secondary outcome was an extraction labelled as demanding. Predictor variables were age, sex, and the jaw (maxilla/mandible). Statistical analyses included χ2 test and binomial logistic regression.
Results: Mean age of the patients was 32.2 years (range 12–97 years). Simple extractions in the maxilla (P < 0.001) and all surgical extractions (P < 0.001) were more likely to be demanding at a higher age. In the mandible, simple extractions were easier at a higher age (odds ratio [OR] 0.971; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.964; 0.978). Surgical extraction was 1.4 times (95% CI 1.145; 1.766) more likely to be demanding in men and twice (95% CI 1.143; 3.462) as demanding in the mandible.
Conclusions: Surgical and maxillary simple extractions were more difficult at a higher age. Surprisingly, in the mandible, simple extractions were easier at a higher age.
Downloads
References
Vranckx M, Fieuws S, Jacobs R, Politis C. Prophylactic vs. symptomatic third molar removal: effects on patient postoperative morbidity. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2021;21:101582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101582
Phillips C, Gelesko S, Proffit W, White R Jr. Recovery after third-molar surgery: the effects of age and sex. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138:700.e1−8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.013
Vranckx M, Fieuws S, Jacobs R, Politis C. Surgical experience and patient morbidity after third molar removal. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;123:297−302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2021.07.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2021.07.004
Blondeau F, Daniel N. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007;73:325 https://www.cda-adc.ca/jcda/vol-73/issue-4/325.html
Momin M, Albright T, Leikin J, Miloro M, Markiewicz M. Patient morbidity among residents extracting third molars: does experience matter? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;125:415−22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.12.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.12.006
Sánchez-Torres A, Soler-Capdevila J, Ustrell-Barral M, Gay-Escoda C. Patient, radiological, and operative factors associated with surgical difficulty in the extraction of third molars: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49:655−65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.10.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.10.009
Renton T, Smeeton N, McGurk M. Factors predictive of difficulty of mandibular third molar surgery. Br Dent J. 2001;190:607−10. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801052a
Benediktsdottir I, Wenzel A, Petersen J, Hinze H. Mandibular third molar removal: risk for extended operation time, postoperative pain, and complications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;97:438−46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.10.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.10.018
Gbotolorun O, Arotiba G, Ladeinde A. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:1977−83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.030
Eklund S, Pittman J. Third-molar removal patterns in an insured population. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132:469−75. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0209
Noro A, Snäll J, Ventä I. Factors affecting number of third molars extracted in a single visit. Acta Odontol Scand. 2023;81:597−602. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2023.2228882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2023.2228882
Kautto A, Vehkalahti M, Ventä I. Age of patient at the extraction of the third molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47:947−51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2018.03.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2018.03.020
Huang G, Drangsholt M, Rue T, Cruikshank D, Hobson K. Age and third molar extraction as risk factors for temporomandibular disorder. J Dent Res. 2008;87:283−7. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700313
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. Classification of procedures of oral health. Chapter E. Procedures of teeth, jaw, mouth, and throat: extractions of teeth [Internet]. Helsinki: Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare; 2025 [cited 2025 Nov 15]. (in Finnish). Available from: https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025062775193
World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human participants. [Internet]. Ferney‑Voltaire: WMA; 2024 [cited 2025 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki/
Vandeplas C, Vranckx M, Hekner D, Politis C, Jacobs R. Does retaining third molars result in the development of pathology over time? A systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78:1892−908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.06.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.06.014
Tsuchida S, Nakayama T. Recent clinical treatment and basic research on the alveolar bone. Biomedicines. 2023;11:843. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030843
Ventä I, Kylätie E, Hiltunen K. Pathology related to third molars in the elderly persons. Clin Oral Invest. 2015;19:1785–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1395-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1395-y
Lindahl O, Ventä I. Level of difficulty of tooth extractions among roughly 100,000 procedures in primary care. Clin Oral Invest. 2023;27:4513–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05073-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05073-4
Yamada S, Hasegawa T, Yoshimura N, Hakoyama Y, Nitta T, Hirahara N, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for postoperative complications after lower third molar extraction: a multicenter prospective observational study in Japan. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101:e29989. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029989 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029989
Leung Y, Cheung L. Risk factors of neurosensory deficits in lower third molar surgery: a literature review of prospective studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.09.005
Baron M, Hudson M, Dagenais M, Macdonald D, Gyger G, El Sayegh T, et al. Relationship between disease characteristics and oral radiologic findings in systemic sclerosis: results from a Canadian Oral Health Study. Arthritis Care Res. 2016;68:673–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22739
Hupp J. Principles of management of impacted teeth. In: Hupp J, Ellis E, Tucker M, editors. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery. 6th edn. Mosby: Elsevier; 2014. p. 144–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-09177-0.00009-8
Baensch F, Kriwalsky M, Kleffmann W, Kunkel M. Third molar complications in the elderly: a matched-pairs analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75:680–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.11.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.11.021
Rothamel D, Wahl G, d’Hoedt B, Nentwig GH, Schwarz F, Becker J. Incidence and predictive factors for perforation of the maxillary antrum in operations to remove upper wisdom teeth: prospective multicentre study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;45:387–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.10.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.10.013
Shmuly T, Winocur-Arias O, Kahn A, Findler M, Adam I. Maxillary tuberosity fractures following third molar extraction, prevalence, and risk factors. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33:e708–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008654
Susarla S, Dodson T. Estimating third molar extraction difficulty: a comparison of subjective and objective factors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:427–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.12.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.12.003
Carvalho R, do Egito Vasconcelos B. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:2714–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.097
Carvalho R, Araújo Filho R, do Egito Vasconcelos B. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted maxillary third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71:839–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.01.001
Glowacki J, Christoph K. Gender differences in the growing, abnormal, and aging jaw. Dent Clin N Am. 2013;57:263–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2013.01.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2013.01.005
Susarla S, Dodson T. Risk factors for third molar extraction difficulty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:1363–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.214
Yoo J, Yeom HG, Shin W, Yun J, Lee J, Jeong S, et al. Deep learning based prediction of extraction difficulty for mandibular third molars. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1954. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81449-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81449-4
Akadiri O, Obiechina A. Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery – a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:771–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.010
Nordic Medico-Statistical Committee (NOMESCO). Classification of surgical procedures. 2011 [cited 2025 Nov 15]. Available from: https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:968721/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Lambade P, Dawane P, Mali D. Assessment of difficulty in mandibular third molar surgery by Lambade-Dawane-Mali’s Index. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;81:772−9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2023.02.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2023.02.013
Pell G, Gregory G. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified technique for removal. Dent Dig. 1933;39:330–7. https://www.bristolctoralsurgery.com/files/2015/03/Pell-and-Gregory-Classification-1933.pdf Accessed 15 Nov 2025
Winter G. Principles of exodontia as applied to the impacted mandibular third molar. St. Louis: American Medical Book Company; 1926 [cited 2025 Nov 15]. Available from: https://archive.org/details/b2981974x
Tuominen R, Eriksson A, Vahlberg T. Private dentists assess treatment required as more extensive, demanding and costly, than public sector dentists. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012;40:362–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00679.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00679.x
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abiel Noro, Johanna Snäll, Irja Ventä
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica publishes original research papers as well as critical reviews relevant to the diagnosis, epidemiology, health service, prevention, aetiology, pathogenesis, pathology, physiology, microbiology, development and treatment of diseases affecting tissues of the oral cavity and associated structures including papers on cause and effect or explanatory/associative relationships for experimental or observational studies.
