Microbial and periodontal shifts induced by orthodontic appliances: a comparative clinical study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v85.45321Keywords:
Appliances, oral microbiota, periodontics, VITEK 2Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the periodontal and microbiological alterations in oral flora associated with using removable appliances and fixed orthodontic treatments.
Methods: The study materials consist of subgingival-supragingival plaque samples and periodontal measurements from 48 patients. The groups include fixed appliance users, removable appliance users, and a nontreatment control group. Periodontal measurements, including gingival index, plaque index, bleeding on probing, mobility, furcation, probing depth, and attachment level, were recorded at baseline (before treatment) and 6 months after treatment initiation. Plaque samples were collected at T0 and T1. Dental plaque samples were cultured on selective media for qualitative and quantitative microbial analysis, followed by qualitative evaluation using the VITEK 2 (Biomerieux) system. Data were analyzed using one-way one-way analysis of variance one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), paired sample-T test, and Duncan’s multiple range test to identify and compare statistically significant differences within and between groups, while intraobserver reliability was assessed using the Kappa statistic.
Results: Mobility or furcation involvement was not detected in any of the groups at either time point. At the T1 stage, a slight improvement in attachment level was observed in both the fixed and removable appliance groups compared with baseline measurements. However, during the same period, a significant increase in mean probing depth was detected only in the fixed appliance group (p = 0.003). Plaque index levels increased in both the removable appliance group (p = 0.019) and the fixed appliance group (p = 0.023). Furthermore, the bleeding on probing index also showed an increase in both groups, with p = 0.020 in the removable appliance group and p = 0.012 in the fixed appliance group. At the T1 stage, an increase in yeast counts was observed in the removable appliance group (p = 0.008), whereas decreases were detected in Lactobacillus (p = 0.004) and mutans streptococci (p = 0.026) levels. In contrast, the fixed appliance group demonstrated significant increases in Lactococcus (p = 0.042) and mutans streptococci (p = 0.037) counts. The identified microorganisms included a diverse range of bacterial species, such as Actinomyces spp., Fusobacterium spp., Lactobacillus spp., Streptococcus spp., Veillonella spp., and other clinically significant genera.
Conclusions: It may be inferred that fixed orthodontic treatments create a biological environment that is more susceptible to adverse periodontal alterations and increased colonization by specific microbial species. Conversely, the potential suppressive effects of removable appliances on certain microbial groups emphasize the need to consider patients’ oral hygiene compliance, periodontal risk profile, and microbial sensitivity during treatment planning.
Downloads
References
Giannini L, Galbiati G, Tartaglia FC, Grecolini ME, Maspero C, Biagi R. Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances versus aligners: an experimental study of periodontal aspects. Dent J (Basel). 2025;13:70. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13020070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13020070
Metin-Gürsoy G, Uzuner FD. The relationship between orthodontic treatment and dental caries. In: Akarslan Z, editor. Dental Caries-Diagnosis, Prevention and Management. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2018. pp. 55–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76470
dos Santos Junior VE, Targino AGR, Flores MAP, Rodríguez-Díaz JM, Teixeira JA, Heimer MV, et al. Antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticle colloids of different sizes and shapes against Streptococcus mutans. Res Chem Intermed. 2017;43:5889–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-017-2969-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-017-2969-5
Mhaske AR, Shetty PC, Bhat NS, Ramachandra CS, Laxmikanth SM, Nagarahalli K, et al. Antiadherent and antibacterial properties of stainless steel and NiTi orthodontic wires coated with silver against Lactobacillus acidophilus – an in vitro study. Prog Orthod. 2015;16:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0110-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0110-0
Mummolo S, Tieri M, Nota A, Caruso S, Darvizeh A, Albani F, et al. Salivary concentrations of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli during an orthodontic treatment. An observational study comparing fixed and removable orthodontic appliances. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020;6:181–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.261
Reichardt E, Geraci J, Sachse S, Rödel J, Pfister W, Löffler B, et al. Qualitative and quantitative changes in the oral bacterial flora occur shortly after implementation of fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;156:735–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.12.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.12.018
Niu Q, Chen S, Bai R, Lu Y, Peng L, Han B, et al. Dynamics of the oral microbiome during orthodontic treatment and antimicrobial advances for orthodontic appliances. iScience. 2024;27:111458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111458
Huang J, Yao Y, Jiang J, Li C. Effects of motivational methods on oral hygiene of orthodontic patients. Medicine. 2018;97:e13182. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013182
Shirbhate U, Bajaj P, Solanki D, Dare S, Sarangi S. Management of orthodontic-induced gingival enlargement: a case report. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e47660. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47660
Velasco-Ibáñez R, Lara-Carrillo E, Morales-Luckie RA, Romero-Guzmán ET, Toral-Rizo VH, Ramírez-Cardona M, et al. Evaluation of the release of nickel and titanium under orthodontic treatment. Sci Rep. 2020;10:22280. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79221-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79221-1
Gül İ, Çolak R, Cicek O. Evaluation of the effect of periodontal health and orthodontic treatment on gingival recession: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25:1069. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06449-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06449-6
Küçükoğlu Çolak M, Çolak R, Cicek O. Fractal dimension analysis of mandibular trabecular architecture in gingival recession during orthodontic retention: a cross-sectional study. Diagnostics. 2025;15:1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15081013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15081013
Wu Y, Cao L, Cong J. The periodontal status of removable appliances vs fixed appliances. Medicine. 2020;99:e23165. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023165
Demircioglu RM, Cicek O, Comert F, Erener H. Do different types of adhesive agents effect enamel demineralization for orthodontic bonding? An ın vitro study. Coatings. 2023;13:401. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020401
Kim GY, Kim S, Chang J-S, Pyo S-W. Advancements in methods of classification and measurement used to assess tooth mobility: a narrative review. J Clin Med. 2023;13:142. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010142
Farook FF, Alnasyan B, Almohammadi D, Alshahrani A, Alyami M, Alharbi R, et al. Reliability assessment of the clinical and radiographic diagnosis of furcation ınvolvement. Open Dent J. 2020;14:403–7. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210602014010403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210602014010403
Newman MG, Takei H, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA. Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology. 10th ed. St. Louis (MO): Saunders Elsevier; 2006.
Garnick JJ, Silverstein L. Periodontal probing: probe tip diameter. J Periodontol. 2000;71:96–103. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.1.96 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.1.96
Löe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand. 1963;21:533–51. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356309011240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356309011240
Hickel R, Mesinger S, Opdam N, Loomans B, Frankenberger R, Cadenaro M, et al. Revised FDI criteria for evaluating direct and indirect dental restorations – recommendations for its clinical use, interpretation, and reporting. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;27:2573–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04814-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04814-1
Tripathi N, Sapra A. Gram staining. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
Carvalhaes CG, Shortridge D, Woosley LN, Gurung N, Castanheira M. Performance of the Vitek 2 Advanced Expert System (AES) as a rapid tool for reporting antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) in Enterobacterales from North and Latin America. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11:e0467322. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.04673-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.04673-22
Ling TKW, Liu ZK, Cheng AFB. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid direct ıdentification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli from positive blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:4705–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.10.4705-4707.2003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.10.4705-4707.2003
Li Y, Gu B, Liu G, Xia W, Fan K, Mei Y, et al. MALDI-TOF MS versus VITEK 2 ANC card for identification of anaerobic bacteria. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:517–23. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.02.15
Ligozzi M, Bernini C, Bonora MG, de Fatima M, Zuliani J, Fontana R. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for ıdentification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of medically relevant gram-positive cocci. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:1681–6. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.5.1681-1686.2002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.5.1681-1686.2002
Chhibber A, Agarwal S, Yadav S, Kuo C-L, Upadhyay M. Which orthodontic appliance is best for oral hygiene? A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153:175–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.10.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.10.009
Davis SM, Plonka AB, Fulks BA, Taylor KL, Bashutski J. Consequences of orthodontic treatment on periodontal health: clinical and microbial effects. Semin Orthod. 2014;20:139–49. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2014.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2014.06.002
Marincak Vrankova Z, Rousi M, Cvanova M, Gachova D, Ruzicka F, Hola V, et al. Effect of fixed orthodontic appliances on gingival status and oral microbiota: a pilot study. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:455. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02511-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02511-9
Papageorgiou SN, Papadelli AA, Eliades T. Effect of orthodontic treatment on periodontal clinical attachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2018;40:176–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx052
Tu C-C, Lo C-Y, Chang P-C, Yin H-J. Orthodontic treatment of periodontally compromised teeth after periodontal regeneration: a restrospective study. J Formos Med Assoc. 2022;121:2065–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2022.02.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2022.02.021
Zhao M, Yu C, Su C, Wang H, Wang X, Weir MD, et al. Dynamic effects of fixed orthodontic treatment on oral health and oral microbiota: a prospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:1537. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05356-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05356-6
ElNaghy R, Al-Qawasmi R, Hasanin M. Does orthodontic treatment using clear aligners and fixed appliances affect periodontal status differently? Evid Based Dent. 2023;24:73–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00890-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00890-8
Shirozaki MU, da Silva RAB, Romano FL, da Silva LAB, De Rossi A, Lucisano MP, et al. Clinical, microbiological, and immunological evaluation of patients in corrective orthodontic treatment. Prog Orthod. 2020;21:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-020-00307-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-020-00307-7
Arikan V, Kizilci E, Ozalp N, Ozcelik B. Effects of fixed and removable space maintainers on plaque accumulation, periodontal health, candidal and enterococcus faecalis carriage. Med Princ Pract. 2015;24:311–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000430787 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000430787
Ghijselings E, Coucke W, Verdonck A, Teughels W, Quirynen M, Pauwels M, et al. Long‐term changes in microbiology and clinical periodontal variables after completion of fixed orthodontic appliances. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2014;17:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12031
Brzezińska-Zając A, Sycińska-Dziarnowska M, Spagnuolo G, Szyszka-Sommerfeld L, Woźniak K. Candida species in children undergoing orthodontic treatment with removable appliances: a pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20:4824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064824
Alforaidi S, Bresin A, Almosa N, Lehrkinder A, Lingström P. Effect of drops containing Lactobacillus reuteri (DSM 17938 and ATCC PTA 5289) on plaque acidogenicity and other caries-related variables in orthodontic patients. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21:271. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02310-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02310-2
Al‐Melh MA, Bhardwaj RG, Pauline EM, Karched M. Real‐time polymerase chain reaction quantification of the salivary levels of cariogenic bacteria in patients with orthodontic fixed appliances. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020;6:328–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.285
Lemos JA, Palmer SR, Zeng L, Wen ZT, Kajfasz JK, Freires IA, et al. The biology of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol Spectr. 2019;7(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0051-2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0051-2018
Lucchese A, Bondemark L, Marcolina M, Manuelli M. Changes in oral microbiota due to orthodontic appliances: a systematic review. J Oral Microbiol. 2018;10:1476645. https://doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2018.1476645 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2018.1476645
Arab S, Nouhzadeh Malekshah S, Abouei Mehrizi E, Ebrahimi Khanghah A, Naseh R, Imani MM. Effect of fixed orthodontic treatment on salivary flow, pH and microbial count. J Dent (Tehran). 2016;13:18–22.
Krasniqi S, Sejdini M, Stubljar D, Jukic T, Ihan A, Aliu K, et al. Antimicrobial effect of orthodontic materials on cariogenic bacteria Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2020;26:1-9. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSMBR.920510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/MSMBR.920510
Könönen E, Wade WG. Actinomyces and related organisms in human ınfections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28:419–42. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00100-14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00100-14
Remes-Troche JM, Coss-Adame E, Valdovinos-Díaz MÁ, Gómez-Escudero O, Icaza-Chávez ME, Chávez-Barrera JA, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus LB: a useful pharmabiotic for the treatment of digestive disorders. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020;13:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756284820971201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1756284820971201
Rams TE, Sautter JD, van Winkelhoff AJ. Antibiotic resistance of human periodontal pathogen parvimonas micra over 10 years. Antibiotics. 2020;9:709. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9100709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9100709
Baty JJ, Stoner SN, Scoffield JA. Oral commensal streptococci: gatekeepers of the oral cavity. Journal of Bacteriology. 2022; 204(11): e00257-22. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00257-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00257-22
Shetty S, Anegundi R, Shenoy PA, Vishwanath S. Understanding antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Finegoldia magna: an insight to an untrodden path. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2023;22:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-023-00583-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-023-00583-1
Brook I. The role of anaerobic bacteria in sinusitis. Anaerobe. 2006;12:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2005.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2005.08.002
Dallel I, Merghni A, Ben Tanfouss S, Tobji S, Ben Amor A, Mastouri M. The effect of orthodontic appliances on oral microflora: a case‐control study. Oral Sci Int. 2019;16:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/osi2.1005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/osi2.1005
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aybüke Asena Atasever İşler, Abdulvahit Erdem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica publishes original research papers as well as critical reviews relevant to the diagnosis, epidemiology, health service, prevention, aetiology, pathogenesis, pathology, physiology, microbiology, development and treatment of diseases affecting tissues of the oral cavity and associated structures including papers on cause and effect or explanatory/associative relationships for experimental or observational studies.
