Permanent maxillary canine eruption in children with clefts – a retrospective study

Authors

  • Mateusz Podleśny Research Unit of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0815-9798
  • Riitta Lithovius Research Unit of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  • Leena Ylikontiola Research Unit of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7874-274X
  • George K. Sándor Research Unit of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3125-5172
  • Ville Vuollo Research Unit of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-8806
  • Virpi Harila Research Unit of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5272-6300

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v85.45420

Keywords:

Cleft lip, Cleft palate, cleft lip and palate, canine eruption, alveolar bone graft

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of alveolar bone grafting (ABG) on the eruption timing and the need for deliberation of the permanent maxillary canine in cleft lip and/or palate patients.

Materials and methods: The study group included 45 cleft sites from a total of 39 unilateral cleft lip and alveolus (CLA, n = 5) and unilateral (n = 22) cleft lip and palate (CLP) and bilateral (n = 12) CLP patients who had undergone treatment in the Oulu Cleft Center (OCC). A split-mouth approach and linear mixed-effects regression analysis was used to compare findings between single individual grafted and non-grafted alveolar sites.

Results: The maxillary canine angulation had a significant role in the timing of the canine eruption (estimate 0.06, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.08). While ABG seemed to delay the canine eruption, this result was not statistically significant. The eruption of the maxillary canine tooth on the bone grafted side was delayed compared to the eruption of the maxillary canine on the non-grafted side (estimate -0.55, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.11). Another factor affecting the canine eruption was surgical exposure of the canine, and it typically emerged about a year after it had been surgically exposed and deliberated (estimate 1.05, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.70).

Conclusion: The permanent maxillary canine eruption was slightly delayed after the ABG. Also, the maxillary canine was found to typically emerge about a year after it has been deliberated. The early bone graft had no benefit in terms of the timing of canine eruption. The angulation of the maxillary canine should be taken into consideration when planning ABG to facilitate its eruption. Careful planning and timing of the ABG and multidisciplinary approach have an important role in cleft patients’ treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hereman V, Cadenas De Llano-Pérula M, Willems G, Coucke W, Wyatt J, Verdonck A. Associated parameters of canine impaction in pa-tients with unilateral cleft lip and palate after secondary alveolar bone grafting: a retrospective study. Eur J Orthod. 2018;40(6):575–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjy011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjy011

Tsurumi Y, Nishimura K, Shimizu M, Imai Y, Igarashi K. Pilot study of factors contributing to canine impaction after secondary alveolar bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):8558. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12565-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12565-y

Becker A, Smith P, Behar R. The incidence of anomalous maxillary lateral incisors in relation to palatally-displaced cuspids. Angle Orthod. 1981;51(1):24–9. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1981)051<0024:TIOAML>2.0.CO;2

Litsas G, Acar A. A review of early displaced maxillary canines: etiology, diagnosis and interceptive treatment. Open Dent J. 2011;5:39-47. Published 2011 Mar 16. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601105010039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601105010039

Bishara SE, Ortho. D. Impacted maxillary canines: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;101(2):159–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70008-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70008-X

Westerlund A, Sjöström M, Björnström L, Ransjö M. What factors are associated with impacted canines in cleft patients? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(11):2109–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.030

Alqerban A. Impacted maxillary canine in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a literature review. Saudi Dent J. 2019;31(1):84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.11.001

Simões Holz I, Martinelli Carvalho R, Lauris JR, Lindauer SJ, Gamba Garib D. Permanent canine eruption into the alveolar cleft region after secondary alveolar bone grafting: are there prediction factors for impaction? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2018;154(5):657–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.01.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.01.016

Kokich VG, Mathews DP. Surgical and orthodontic management of impacted teeth. Dent Clin North Am. 1993;37(2):181–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00276-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00276-2

Sajnani AK. Permanent maxillary canines – review of eruption pattern and local etiological factors leading to impaction. J Investig Clin Dent. 2015;6(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12067

Kang NH. Current methods for the treatment of alveolar clefts. Arch Plast Surg. 2017;44(3):188–93. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.188

Haavikko K. The formation and the alveolar and clinical eruption of the permanent teeth. An orthopantomographic study. Suom Ham-maslaak Toim. 1970;66(3):103–70.

Shaw WC, Semb G, Nelson P, Brattström V, Mølsted K, Prahl-Andersen B, et al. The Eurocleft project 1996–2000: overview. J Cranio Max-illofac Surg. 2001;29(3):131–40. https://doi.org/10.1054/JCMS.2001.0217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2001.0217

Lilja J. Alveolar bone grafting. Indian J Plast Surg. 2009;42(3):110. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.57200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1699383

Desai SK, Adirajaiah S, Desai AK, Kumar N. Observing the eruption of canine after secondary alveolar bone grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;79(12):2562–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2021.06.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2021.06.021

Miller LL, Kauffmann D, St. John D, Wang D, Grant JH, Waite PD. Retrospective review of 99 patients with secondary alveolar cleft repair. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68(6):1283–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.106

Semb G. Alveolar bone grafting. In: Frontiers of oral biology. Ed. M.T. Cobourne. S.Karger AG. 2012;16:124–36. https://doi.org/10.1159/000337666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000337666

Luque-Martin E, Tobella-Camps ML, Rivera-Baro A. Alveolar graft in the cleft lip and palate patient: review of 104 cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19(5):e531–7. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19413

Gustafsson-Silén C. Surgical treatment and long-term outcomes of cleft lip and palate. Helsinki: Unigrafia; 2022.

Weissler EH, Paine KM, Ahmed MK, Taub PJ. Alveolar bone grafting and cleft lip and palate: a review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(6):

1287–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002778

Jabbari F, Reiser E, Thor A, Hakelius M, Nowinski D. Correlations between initial cleft size and dental anomalies in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients after alveolar bone grafting. Ups J Med Sci. 2016;121(1):33–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2015.1134733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2015.1134733

Linderup BW, Cattaneo PM, Jensen J, Kuseler A. Mandibular symphyseal bone graft for reconstruction of alveolar cleft defects: volumetric assessment with cone beam computed tomography 1-year postsurgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(1):64–72. https://doi.org/10.1597/14-143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1597/14-143

Andersen K, Nørholt SE, Knudsen J, Küseler A, Jensen J. Donor site morbidity after reconstruction of alveolar bone defects with mandibu-lar symphyseal bone grafts in cleft patients – 111 consecutive patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43(4):428–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.09.007

Kainulainen V, Sándor G, Clokie C, Oikarinen K. Intraoral bone harvesting in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 2002;5:216–22.

Sándor GKB, Lam DK, Ylikontiola LP, Kainulainen VT, Oikarinen KS, Clokie CML. Autogenous bone harvesting techniques. Munksgaard: Blackwell; 2010.

Ristaniemi J, Karjalainen T, Kujasalo K, Rajala W, Pesonen P, Lähdesmäki R. Eruption pattern of the maxillary canines: features indicating treatment needs as seen in PTG at the late mixed stage – part II. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022;23(4):567–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00719-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00719-5

Russell KA, McLeod CE. Canine eruption in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008;45(1):73–80. https://doi.org/10.1597/07-049.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1597/07-049.1

Lehtonen V, Anttonen V, Ylikontiola LP, Koskinen S, Pesonen P, Sándor GK. Dental anomalies associated with cleft lip and palate in North-ern Finland. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015;16(4):327–332.

Olive RJ. Factors influencing the non-surgical eruption of palatally impacted canines. Aust Orthod J. 2005;21(2):95–101. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2005-0011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2005-0011

Marks SC, Schroeder HE. Tooth eruption: theories and facts. Anat Rec. 1996;245(2):374–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199606)245:2<374::AID-AR18>3.0.CO;2-M DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199606)245:2<374::AID-AR18>3.0.CO;2-M

Marks SC. The basic and applied biology of tooth eruption. Connect Tissue Res. 1995;32(1–4):149–57. https://doi.org/10.3109/03008209509013718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/03008209509013718

Susarla SM, Andrews R, Hilal N, Swanson EW, Susarla HK, Martin BS, et al. Is canine eruption velocity affected by the presence of allo-graft within a repaired alveolar cleft? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(10):1888–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.06.150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.06.150

MacIsaac ZM, Rottgers SA, Davit AJ, Ford M, Losee JE, Kumar AR. Alveolar reconstruction in cleft patients: decreased morbidity and im-proved outcomes with supplemental demineralized bone matrix and cancellous allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(3):625–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31825dcb75 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31825dcb75

Kaura AS, Srinivasa DR, Kasten SJ. Optimal timing of alveolar cleft bone grafting for maxillary clefts in the cleft palate population. J Crani-ofac Surg. 2018;29(6):1551–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004680 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004680

Hu AC, Jain NS, Chan CH, Malapati SH, Dang BN, Bertrand AA, et al. Early alveolar bone grafting is associated with lower regraft rates and improvements in long-term psychosocial outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;149(1):60E–7E. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008646

Mundra LS, Lowe KM, Khechoyan DY. Alveolar bone graft timing in patients with cleft lip & palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33:206–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007890

Carbullido MK, Dean RA, Kamel GN, Davis GL, Hornacek M, Segal RM, et al. Long-term treatment outcomes of primary alveolar bone grafts for alveolar clefts: a qualitative systematic review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022;59(1):86–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665621995047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665621995047

Published

2026-02-11