Use of a handheld communication tool for children and youths during dental procedures: a two-site controlled intervention study

Authors

  • Elisabeth Ørskov Rotevatn Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Children and Youth Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
  • Emilie Stensaker Paz Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
  • Louise Sandal Løkeland Department of Information Science and Media Studies, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • Frode Guribye Department of Information Science and Media Studies, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • Grete Olin Engan Sogndal Dental Clinic, Vestland County Municipality, Sogndal, Norway
  • Cecilie Gudveig Gjerde Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Center for Translational Oral Research, Department of Clinical Dentistry, Medical Faculty, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • Torgils Lægreid Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Center for Translational Oral Research, Department of Clinical Dentistry, Medical Faculty, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • David N. Breidablik Vatne Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • Unnur Bergmann Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • Lars Jørgen Rygh Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
  • Mette Engan Children and Youth Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v85.45760

Keywords:

pediatric dental care, procedural coping, dental fear and anxiety, nonverbal communication, digital health

Abstract

Background: Effective communication between dental professionals and patients is essential for quality care. We aimed to evaluate whether Grasp, a novel handheld squeezable device providing real-time visual and auditory feedback to signal discomfort, improved communication between patients and their dentists during dental procedures.

Materials and methods: Patients aged 6–25 years were recruited from two dental clinics in Norway. Participants were divided into two groups: One received standard care, the other used Grasp in addition to standard care. All patients – and additionally caregivers of those under 16 – completed pre- and post-treatment questionnaires, rating communication on a 1–10 scale. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the intervention’s effect, adjusting for baseline scores.

Results: A total of 121 patients (58% females; median age 16 years) participated, with 60 using Grasp. Patients using Grasp reported greater confidence that the dentist understood their feelings, recognized when they wanted to stop, and found it easier to speak up during treatment (β = 2.10–2.54, p < 0.05). The effect of Grasp was more pronounced for participants reporting lower baseline confidence in communication with their dentist.

Conclusions: Grasp appeared to improve communication regarding discomfort during dental procedures, particularly for those who initially reported lower levels of communication confidence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Glick M, Williams DM. FDI vision 2030: delivering optimal oral health for all. Int Dent J. 2021;71(1):3–4.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2020.12.026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2020.12.026

Ho JCY, Chai HH, Luo BW, Lo ECM, Huang MZ, Chu CH. An overview of dentist–patient communication in quality dental care. Dent J. 2025;13(1):31.

https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13010031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13010031

Skinner EA, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ. Perceived control and the development of coping. In: Folkman S, editor. The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195375343.013.0003

Sartory G, Richard H, Ilka P, Jöhren P. Predictors of behavioral avoidance in dental phobia: the role of gender, dysfunctional cognitions and the need for control. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2006;19(3):279–91.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800600841240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800600841240

Newton T, Asimakopoulou K, Daly B, Scambler S, Scott S. The management of dental anxiety: time for a sense of proportion? Br Dent J. 2012;213(6):271–4.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.830 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.830

Logan HL, Baron RS, Keeley K, Law A, Stein S. Desired control and felt control as mediators of stress in a dental setting. Health Psychol. 1991;10(5):352–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.10.5.352

https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.10.5.352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.10.5.352

Shim YS, Kim AH, Jeon EY, An SY. Dental fear & anxiety and dental pain in children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2015;15(2):53–61.

https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2015.15.2.53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2015.15.2.53

Silveira ER, Cademartori MG, Schuch HS, Armfield JA, Demarco FF. Estimated prevalence of dental fear in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2021;108:103632.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103632

Grisolia BM, Dos Santos APP, Dhyppolito IM, Buchanan H, Hill K, Oliveira BH. Prevalence of dental anxiety in children and adolescents globally: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021;31(2):168–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12712

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103632

Klingberg G, Broberg AG. Dental fear/anxiety and dental behaviour management problems in children and adolescents: a review of prevalence and concomitant psychological factors. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007;17(6):391–406.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00872.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00872.x

Appukuttan DP. Strategies to manage patients with dental anxiety and dental phobia: literature review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2016;8:35–50.

https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S63626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S63626

Dhar V, Gosnell E, Jayaraman J, Law C, Majstorović M, Marghalani AA, et al. Nonpharmacological behavior guidance for the pediatric dental patient. Pediatr Dent. 2023;45(5):385–410.

Singh H, Meshram G, Warhadpande M, Kapoor P. Effect of ‘perceived control’ in management of anxious patients undergoing endodontic therapy by use of an electronic communication system. J Conserv Dent. 2012;15(1):51–5.

https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.92607 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.92607

Pisano M, Bramanti A, De Benedetto G, Martin Carreras-Presas C, Di Spirito F. The use of audiovisual distraction tools in the dental setting for pediatric subjects with special healthcare needs: a review and proposal of a multi-session model for behavioral management. Children. 2024;11(9):1077.

https://doi.org/10.3390/children11091077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children11091077

Gurav KM, Kulkarni N, Shetty V, Vinay V, Borade P, Ghadge S, et al. Effectiveness of audio and audio-visual distraction aids for management of pain and anxiety in children and adults undergoing dental treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;46(2):86–106.

https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4625-46.2.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4625-46.2.2

Vignesh R, Sukanya T, Priyadharshni I. Use of hand signals for communication during dental procedure. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent. 2016;14(3):308–12.

https://doi.org/10.4103/2319-5932.187173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2319-5932.187173

Fitzmaurice G. A conundrum in the analysis of change. Nutrition. 2001;17(4):360–1.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-9007(00)00593-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(00)00593-1

Montgomery R. Sample size justification in feasibility studies: moving beyond published guidance. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025;11(1):88.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01675-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01675-9

Almarzouq SSFS, Chua H, Yiu CKY, Lam PPY. Effectiveness of nonpharmacological behavioural interventions in managing dental fear and anxiety among children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(5):537.

https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12050537 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12050537

R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023. [Cited date Sept 21, 2025] Available from: https://www.R-project.org/

Corah NL. Effect of perceived control on stress reduction in pedodontic patients. J Dent Res. 1973;52(6):1261–4.

https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345730520061701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345730520061701

Shams L, Seitz AR. Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008;12(11):411–17.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006

Ernst MO, Bülthoff HH. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004;8(4):162–9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.002

Böhme Kristensen C, Asimakopoulou K, Scambler S. Enhancing patient-centred care in dentistry: a narrative review. Br Med Bull. 2023;148(1):79–88.

https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldad026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldad026

Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1997.

Luo Y, Heneghan C, Persaud N. Catalogue of bias: novelty bias. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023;28(6):410–11.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112215

Published

2026-03-31