Assessment of impacted canine patterns and correlations with craniofacial discrepancy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v85.45907Keywords:
impacted maxillary canine, panoramic radiography, cephalometric analysis, craniofacial discrepancy, skeletal morphologyAbstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence, spatial patterns, and craniofacial skeletal associations of impacted maxillary canines using panoramic and cephalometric analyses in a large patient cohort.
Materials and methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated 9593 panoramic radiographs of individuals aged ≥ 14 years. Cephalometric analysis was achieved on subjects aged ≥ 18 years with skeletal maturity (Cervical Vertebral Maturation Index stage ≥ 6), comparing 94 cases with maxillary impacted canines (MIC) to 100 age- and sex-matched controls. Positional measurements (sector, depth, and angulation) were compared with skeletal patterns using independent t-tests, analysis of variance, and chi-square tests (α = 0.05).
Results: Analysis revealed a maxillary canine impaction prevalence of 2.02%, with a significant female predilection (54.1%) and a maxilla-to-mandible ratio of 4:1. The predominant spatial pattern was mesioangular inclination (67%) in Sector 0 (35.2%) at coronal depth (54.1%). Compared to controls, MIC cases exhibited significant maxillary skeletal deficiency (e.g., anterior nasal spine – posterior nasal spine [ANS-PNS]: 50.1 ± 5.1 mm vs. 53.1 ± 3.7 mm; p < 0.001) and vertical hyperdivergence (Sella-Nasion to Gonion-Gnathion angle [SN-GoGn]: 32.8° ± 6.2 vs. 29.8° ± 6.4; p = 0.001). Upper incisor inclination showed no intergroup difference.
Conclusions: Maxillary canine impaction is strongly associated with maxillary skeletal deficiencies and vertical growth discrepancies. The common finding of mesioangular impactions in Sector 0 at coronal depth indicates a high risk for adjacent root resorption. We recommend incorporating cephalometric screening (focusing on ANS-PNS < 50 mm and SN-GoGn > 32°) into early adolescent assessments to identify at-risk patients and guide timely interceptive strategies such as maxillary expansion.
Downloads
References
Schroder AGD, Guariza-Filho O, de Araujo CM, Ruellas AC, Tanaka OM, Porporatti AL. To what extent are impacted canines associated with root resorption of the adjacent tooth?: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018;149(9):765–77.e8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2018.05.012
Alhammadi K, Marashdeh H, Hussain M. Assessing the effect of innovation diffusion and technology readiness theories on attitude, behavioral intention and implementation of smart learning. Cross Cult Strateg Manag. 2023;30:657–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-12-2022-0213
d’Apuzzo F, Fabiani G, Raucci G, De Gregorio F, D’Anna T, Perillo L. Problematiche associate all’inclusione del canino mascellare. Dental Cadmos. 2015 Feb 1;83(2):70-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8524(15)70269-2
Graber LW, Vig KW, Vanarsdall RL, Huang GJ. Ortodoncia: principios y técnicas actuales. Barcelona: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017.
Lindauer SJ, Rubenstein LK, Hang WM, Andersen WC, Isaacson RJ. Canine impaction identified early with panoramic radiographs. J Am Dent Assoc. 1992;123(3):91–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1992.0069
Ericson S, Kurol J. Radiographic examination of ectopically erupting maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped. 1987;91(6):483–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90005-9
Athanasiou M, Papadopoulou CI, Alamoudi R, Halazonetis D, Verna C, Gkantidis N, et al. Palatal canine impaction is associated with craniofacial shape in humans. Eur J Orthod. 2024;46(6):cjae051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjae051
Mercuri E, Cassetta M, Cavallini C, Vicari D, Leonardi R, Barbato E. Skeletal features in patient affected by maxillary canine impaction. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18(4):e597–602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18746
Montes-Díaz ME, Martínez-González A, Arriazu-Navarro R, Alvarado-Lorenzo A, Gallardo-López NE, Ortega-Aranegui R. Skeletal and dental morphological characteristics of the maxillary in patients with impacted canines using cone beam computed tomography: a retrospective clinical study. J Pers Med. 2022;12(1):96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010096
Cicek O, Gurel T, Demir Cicek B. Investigation of the relationship of impacted maxillary canines with orthodontic malocclusion: a retrospective study. Children. 2023;10(6):950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children10060950
Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA, Jr, editors. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005;11(3):119–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005
Jang K-T. Management of maxillary impacted canines. J Korean Acad Pedtatr Dent. 2023;50:142–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2023.50.2.142
Koc N, Dogru HB, Cagirankaya LB, Dural S, van der Stelt PF. CBCT assessment of gubernacular canals in relation to eruption disturbance and pathologic condition associated with impacted/unerupted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019;127(2):175–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.09.007
Alassiry AM. Accuracy of different cephalometric analyses in the diagnosis of class III malocclusion in Saudi and Yemeni population. J Orthod Sci. 2020;9(1):14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_21_20
Fekonja A. Evaluation of the eruption of permanent teeth and their association with malocclusion. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022;8(4):836–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.544
Yılmaz H, Çakmak Özlü F, Icen M, Icen E. Impacted maxillary canines and their relationship with lateral incisor resorption: a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study. 2020;36(2):160–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2020-018
Ng WL, Cunningham A, Pandis N, Bister D, Seehra J. Impacted maxillary canine: assessment of prevalence, severity and location of root resorption on maxillary incisors: a retrospective CBCT study. Int Orthod. 2024;22(3):100890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100890
Eryani F, Akwa’a A, Ishaq R, al-akwa A. Association between maxillary impacted canine and vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns in a group of yemeni adults. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2025;26:178–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3821
Sadry S, Karaman A. Evaluation of the relationship of the upper impacted maxillary canines with maxillary base. Süleyman Demirel Üniv Sağlık Bil Derg. 2021;12(3):371–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.908512
Devi MA, Padmanabhan S. Role of polymorphisms of MSX1 and PAX9 genes in palatal impaction of maxillary canines. J Orthod. 2019;46(1):14–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1465312518820537
Brézulier D, Carnet S, Marie-Cousin A, Sixou J-L. Screening for the risk of canine impaction, what are the presumptive signs and how does it affect orthodontics? A cross-sectional study in France. PLoS One. 2023;18(12):e0296395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296395
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Salma Abbas, Lale Taner, Orhan Özdiler, Erhan Özdiler
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica publishes high quality original research papers as well as critical reviews relevant on diseases of the oral cavity, their treatment, epidemiology and associated biomaterials and their development.
