Incidence of sinus membrane perforation in transcrestal graftless maxillary sinus augmentation: a meta-analysis

Authors

  • Zhi-Cheng Huang Department of Prosthodontics, Shaoxing Stomatological Hospital, Shaoxing City, China
  • Xiao-Ling Wang Department of Orthodontics, Shaoxing Stomatological Hospital, Shaoxing City, China
  • Qi-Qi Jin Department of Prosthodontics, Shaoxing Stomatological Hospital, Shaoxing City, China
  • Meng-Li Chen Department of Prosthodontics, Shaoxing Stomatological Hospital, Shaoxing City, China
  • Ya-Qin Zhao Department of Preventive Dentistry, Shaoxing Stomatological Hospital, Shaoxing City, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v85.46021

Keywords:

sinus floor elevation, Schneiderian membrane perforation, graftless, osseodensification, osteotome, dental implant, meta-analysis, complication

Abstract

Objectives: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence and complications in graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation.

Materials and methods: Several databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus) were searched for studies reporting perforation rates, early implant failure (≤12 months) and postoperative complications. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed bias. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Evidence certainty was graded using the GRADE system.

Results: Among 14 studies comprising 2119 sinus-lift sites, the pooled incidence of Schneiderian membrane perforation was 1% (95% CI: 0% (95% CI: 0% the pooled incidence of Schneiderian membrane perforation was 1% (95% CI: 0% months) and postoperative failure (≤12 months) was also 1% (95% CI: 0–6%) based on 711 evaluated implants, showing no heterogeneity (I² = 0%). No postoperative complications (acute sinusitis or epistaxis) were reported in the included literature. Subgroup analysis revealed that motor-driven techniques were associated with a significantly higher perforation rate (34%) compared to conventional osteotome methods (0%). The certainty of evidence was rated as very low for all outcomes, including membrane perforation and secondary indicators.

Conclusions: Graftless transcrestal sinus elevation is associated with low Schneiderian membrane perforation rates, favourable implant survival and minimal postoperative complications. Despite methodological heterogeneity, current evidence supports the clinical safety of graftless techniques.

Clinical relevance: Clinicians can confidently utilise graftless sinus floor elevation approaches with appropriate patient selection and careful surgical techniques to minimise complications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lyu M, Xu D, Zhang X, Yuan Q. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a review of current evidence on anatomical factors and a decision tree. Int J Oral Sci. 2023;15(1):41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-023-00248-x

Bacevic M, Compeyron Y, Lecloux G, Rompen E, Lambert F. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of sinus floor elevation using the lateral window technique versus the hydrodynamic transalveolar approach: a preliminary randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(9):5391–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03847-2

Alalshaikh M, Tabasum A, Alotaibi N, Alotaibi A, Alesawy A, Ahmad S. Risk factors contributing to membrane perforation in lateral window maxillary sinus elevation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2025;139(6):642–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.12.008

Shalash M, Mounir M, Elbanna T. Evaluation of crestal sinus floor elevation in cases exhibiting an oblique sinus floor with a residual bone height of 4.0–7.0 mm using Densah burs with simultaneous implant placement: a prospective clinical study. Int J Implant Dent. 2023;9(1):41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00510-1

Duan DH, Fu JH, Qi W, Du Y, Pan J, Wang HL. Graft-free maxillary sinus floor elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2017;88(6):550–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2017.160665

Soares LFF, Malzoni CMA, da Silveira ML, Junior EM, Pigossi SC. Evaluation of different approaches for sinus membrane perforation repair during sinus elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024;39(1):107–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10180

Albadani MM, Elayah SA, Al-Wesabi MA, Al-Aroomi OA, Al Qadasy NE, Saleh H. A graftless maxillary sinus lifting approach with simultaneous dental implant placement: a prospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-03949-9

Elghobashy MTM, Shaaban AM, Melek LNF. Radiographic comparison between Densah burs and osteotome for graftless internal sinus lifting with simultaneous implant placement: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;52(3):388–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2022.06.020

Marković A, Mišić T, Calvo-Guirado JL, Delgado-Ruíz RA, Janjić B, Abboud M. Two-center prospective, randomized, clinical, and radiographic study comparing osteotome sinus floor elevation with or without bone graft and simultaneous implant placement. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18(5):873–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12373

Yang T, Yi W, Xu W, Xing X, Wu B. Evaluation of accuracy and membrane perforation in robotic-assisted implant surgery for transalveolar sinus floor elevation: a retrospective case series. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05848-z

Walsh KL, Winegarner A, Hayward GL. Echocardiographic imaging of a bifurcated double barrel coronary sinus. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023;18(1):41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-023-02105-8

Lv H, Sun X, Wang J, Wang H, Wang L, Zhou Y. Flapless osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation using platelet-rich fibrin versus lateral approach using deproteinised bovine bone mineral for residual bone height of 2-6 mm: a randomised trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33(7):700–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13934

Karande P, Thakuria J, Sinha AP, Karande V, Asthana S, Gupta S. Comparative assessment of Schneiderian membrane thickness in smokers and non-smokers using cone-beam computed tomography: an observational study. Cureus. 2025;17(3):e81481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.81481

Cruz RS, Lemos CAA, Batista VES, Hiskell Francine Fernandes E Oliveira, Jéssica Marcela de Luna Gomes, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer. Short implants versus longer implants with maxillary sinus lift. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0086

Nedir R, Nurdin N, Khoury P, Perneger T, Hage ME, Bernard JP. Osteotome sinus floor elevation with and without grafting material in the severely atrophic maxilla. A 1-year prospective randomized controlled study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(11):1257–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02569.x

Brizuela A, Martín N, Fernández-Gonzalez FJ, Larrazábal C, Anta A. Osteotome sinus floor elevation without grafting material: results of a 2-year prospective study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014;6(5):e479–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.51576

Zill A, Precht C, Beck-Broichsitter B, Sehner S, Smeets R, Heiland M. Implants inserted with graftless osteotome sinus floor elevation – a 5-year post-loading retrospective study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9(3):277–89.

French D, Nadji N, Shariati B, Hatzimanolakis P, Larjava H. Survival and success rates of dental implants placed using osteotome sinus floor elevation without added bone grafting: a retrospective study with a follow-up of up to 10 years. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016;36(Suppl):s89–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2191

Nedir R, Nurdin N, Abi Najm S, El Hage M, Bischof M. Short implants placed with or without grafting into atrophic sinuses: the 5-year results of a prospective randomized controlled study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(7):877–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12893

Si MS, Shou YW, Shi YT, Yang GL, Wang HM, He FM. Long-term outcomes of osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafts: a clinical retrospective study of 4–9 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(11):1392–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12752

Rawat A, Thukral H, Jose A. Indirect sinus floor elevation technique with simultaneous implant placement without using bone grafts. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019;9(1):96–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_11_19

Qian SJ, Mo JJ, Si MS, Qiao SC, Shi JY, Lai HC. Long-term outcomes of osteotome sinus floor elevation with or without bone grafting: the 10-year results of a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47(8):1016–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13260

Rammelsberg P, Pahle J, Büsch C, Zenthöfer A. Long-term apical bone gain after implant placement combined with internal sinus-floor elevation without graft. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01178-4

Karaca Ç, Koç O, Er N, Uçar-Boyacıgil D. Evaluation of sinus membrane perforation in osteotome sinus floor elevation with and without grafting. J Oral Implantol. 2022;48(6):550–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00358

Alzoubi FM, AlRumaih HS, Alhumaidan AA, Al-Sulimmani W. Implant stability after graftless motor-driven crestal sinus elevation: a cohort study. J Oral Implantol. 2024;50(5):461–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00015

Mazor Z, Gaspar J, Silva R, Pohl S, Gandhi Y, Huwais S. Maxillary sinus membrane perforation rate utilizing osseodensification-mediated transcrestal sinus floor elevation: a multicenter clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024;26(6):1172–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13368

Stacchi C, Bernardello F, Spinato S, Mura R, Perelli M, Lombardi T. Intraoperative complications and early implant failure after transcrestal sinus floor elevation with residual bone height ≤ 5 mm: a retrospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33(8):783–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13959

Li N, Jiang Z, Pu R, Zhu D, Yang G. Implant failure and associated risk factors of transcrestal sinus floor elevation: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023;34(1):66–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14020

Nemati M, Khodaverdi N, Hosn Centenero SA, Tabrizi R. Which factors affect the risk of membrane perforation in lateral window maxillary sinus elevation? A prospective cohort study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2023;51(7–8):427–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2023.06.010

Ghosh A, Sekar A, Sriram CS, Sivakumar K, Upadhyay GA, Pandurangi UM. Septal venous channel perforation during left bundle branch area pacing: a prospective study. Europace. 2024;26(6):euae124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae124

Gao J, Yin W, Liu Y, Zhao X, Qu Y, Man Y. Effectiveness and complications of transcrestal sinus floor elevation using the cushioned grind-out technique: a retrospective cohort study with up to 7 years of follow-up. J Clin Periodontol. 2023;50(9):1202–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13832

Liu F., Yuan F., Ying WG, Shan JL, Sun XD. Clinical evaluation of modified maxillary sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement: a retrospective randomized controlled study. Research Square [preprint]. 2025 Nov 11; posted version v1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7527675/v1

Downloads

Published

2026-06-04