Comparative evaluation of apical root resorption in adult patients treated with clear aligners and fixed orthodontic appliances using CBCT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v85.46274Keywords:
Root resorption, orthodontic appliances, cone-beam computed tomography, orthodonticsAbstract
Background: Orthodontically induced external apical root resorption is a common iatrogenic effect of tooth movement. With the increasing use of clear aligner therapy, it is important to evaluate whether its biomechanics reduce root resorption compared with fixed orthodontic appliances.
Aim: To compare apical root resorption in patients treated with clear aligners and fixed appliances using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Methodology: A retrospective comparative CBCT-based analysis was conducted on 120 orthodontic patients. Root volumes and lengths were measured from the cementoenamel junction to the apex using pre- and post-treatment CBCT scans. Apical root resorption was quantified as percentage volume loss and absolute root length reduction. Primary analyses employed linear mixed-effects models adjusted for clustering of teeth within patients and for tooth type, arch, extraction status, and treatment duration.
Results: Clear aligner therapy was associated with significantly lower apical root resorption than fixed appliances. Mean percentage root volume loss was lower in the aligner group (6.1 ± 4.8%) than in the fixed appliance group (8.4 ± 6.1%) (p = 0.004). Mean root length reduction was also smaller with aligners (p = 0.001). Clinically significant root resorption occurred less frequently in the aligner group (p = 0.048). Longer treatment duration increased resorption risk.
Conclusion: Clear aligner therapy is associated with less apical root resorption than fixed orthodontic treatment, while treatment duration remains an independent risk factor.
Downloads
References
Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption. Part I: the basic science aspects. Angle Orthod. 2002;72(2):175–9.
Weltman B, Vig KW, Fields HW, Shanker S, Kaizar EE. Root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(4):462–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.021
Dudic A, Giannopoulou C, Leuzinger M, Kiliaridis S. Detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment by using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(4):434–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.10.014
Krieger E, Drechsler T, Schmidtmann I, Jacobs C, Haag S, Wehrbein H. Apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment with aligners? A retrospective radiometric study. Head Face Med. 2013;9:21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-9-21
Lund H, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of root length and marginal bone level during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(3):466–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/072909-427.1
Barbagallo LJ, Jones AS, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA. Physical properties of root cementum: part 10. Comparison of the effects of invisible removable thermoplastic appliances with light and heavy orthodontic forces on premolar cementum. A microcomputed-tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(2):218–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.043
Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL. Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(5):881–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/061614-436.1
Yi J, Li M, Li Y, Li X, Zhao Z. Root resorption during orthodontic treatment with self-ligating or conventional brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2016;16(1):125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0320-y
Jyotirmay, Singh SK, Adarsh K, Kumar A, Gupta AR, Sinha A. Comparison of apical root resorption in patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliance and clear aligners: a cone-beam computed tomography study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22(7):763–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3119
Deng Y, Sun Y, Xu T. Evaluation of root resorption after comprehensive orthodontic treatment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0579-2
Gay G, Ravera S, Castroflorio T, Garino F, Rossini G, Parrini S, et al. Root resorption during orthodontic treatment with Invisalign®: a radiometric study. Prog Orthod. 2017;18(1):12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0166-0
Zhang X, Zhou H, Liao X, Liu Y. The influence of bracket torque on external apical root resorption in bimaxillary protrusion patients: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02042-3
Singh S, Jain RK, Balasubramaniam A. Comparative assessment of external apical root resorption between subjects treated with clear aligners and fixed orthodontic appliances: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024;18(2):85–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.40932
Selvaraj M, Nivethitha B, Madhan B. Orthodontically induced external apical root resorption with clear aligners compared to fixed appliance treatment: an umbrella review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025;15(5):938–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.06.011
Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Obrez A, Agran B. How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(1):27–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.018
Iglesias-Linares A, Yañez-Vico RM, Ballesta S, Ortiz-Ariza E, Mendoza-Mendoza A, Perea E, et al. Interleukin 1 gene cluster SNPs (rs1800587, rs1143634) influences post-orthodontic root resorption in endodontic and their contralateral vital control teeth differently. Int Endod J. 2012;45(11):1018–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02065.x
Verna C, Dalstra M, Melsen B. The rate and the type of orthodontic tooth movement is influenced by bone turnover in a rat model. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22(4):343–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/22.4.343
Castroflorio T, Garino F, Lazzaro A, Debernardi C. Upper-incisor root control with Invisalign appliances. J Clin Orthod. 2013;47(6):346–51; quiz 387.
Chan E, Darendeliler MA. Physical properties of root cementum: part 5. Volumetric analysis of root resorption craters after application of light and heavy orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127(2):186–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.11.026
Al-Qawasmi RA, Hartsfield JK, Jr, Everett ET, Flury L, Liu L, Foroud TM, et al. Genetic predisposition to external apical root resorption. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123(3):242–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2003.42
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rakhi Issrani, Abdullah Hammad Alshammari, Mohammad Raji Alrwuili, Mohammed Ahmed Aljabab, Nasser Attallah Alenzi, Poonam Joshi, Yousef T. Aldoseri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica publishes original research papers as well as critical reviews relevant to the diagnosis, epidemiology, health service, prevention, aetiology, pathogenesis, pathology, physiology, microbiology, development and treatment of diseases affecting tissues of the oral cavity and associated structures including papers on cause and effect or explanatory/associative relationships for experimental or observational studies.
