Orthodontic treatment need assessment and treatment timing – a questionnaire survey among specialists in Denmark and Sweden

Authors

  • Asta Nyvang Rank Orthodontics, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Mikael Sonesson Department of Orthodontics, Section 4, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0320-8096
  • Sofia Petrén Department of Orthodontics, Section 4, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
  • Liselotte Paulsson Department of Orthodontics, Section 4, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
  • Liselotte Sonnesen Orthodontics, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v85.46501

Keywords:

Orthodontic treatment need, orthodontic treatment indication, orthodontic indices, clinical consensus, publicly funded treatment, malocclusions

Abstract

Objective: To analyze national and regional differences in assessment of orthodontic treatment needs and timing for treatment between specialists in orthodontics in Denmark and Sweden. Additionally, to map the use of digital platforms in orthodontic referral processes.

Materials and methods: A questionnaire comprising 20 items was developed to assess nine patient cases with different malocclusions and sent to nearly 500 board-certified orthodontic specialists in Denmark and Sweden. Each case was documented by clinical photos, line drawings of the head and face, and malocclusion descriptions. Before the start of the survey, the questionnaire was tested in both countries by eight experienced orthodontists. The survey was distributed between 06 November 2024 and 27 January 2025. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests with false discovery rate correction.

Results: Two hundred and nineteen responses were included. Both intra-regional and cross-national differences were found in treatment need assessments. Danish respondents showed greater agreement, while Swedish assessments varied more. Digital referral systems were more common in Sweden but linked to an increased tendency to select patient observation rather than making a definitive assessment of treatment need. In Denmark, high agreement (> 80%) was found for treatment need in six of nine cases. One patient case was generally deemed not eligible, while one case demonstrated high variability. Significant regional differences were noted in both treatment need and timing. In Sweden, strong agreement was observed for five cases. One case showed wide variation. Regional differences were significant for some cases, both in need and preferred treatment timing.

Conclusions: Specialists in Orthodontics in Denmark showed more consistent assessments than those in Sweden, likely due to national guidelines. Digital referrals were common in Sweden but linked to more varied evaluations, especially in borderline cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alqahtani MS, Alshaks NM, Alshahrani NFM, Naghi WM, Alharbi WM, Mahmood ST, et al. Review on anterior crossbite diagnosis and management approach in paediatric age: literature review. World J Environ Biosci. 2021;10(3):14–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51847/vrbgfj7OVY

Singh V, Sharma A. Epidemiology of malocclusion and assessment of orthodontic treatment need for Nepalese children. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014;2014:1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/768357

Thilander B, Bjerklin K, Bondemark L. Essential orthodontics. 1st ed. Vol. 1. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell; 2018. p. 3–153.

Cenzato N, Nobili A, Maspero C. Prevalence of dental malocclusions in different geographical areas: scoping review. Dent J. 2021;9(10):117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9100117

Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Fayed MS, Labib A, El-Saaidi C. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: a systematic review. Dent Press J Orthod. 2018;23(6):e1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.40.e1-10.onl

De Ridder L, Aleksieva A, Willems G, Declerck D, de Llano-Pérula MC. Prevalence of orthodontic malocclusions in healthy children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(12):7446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127446

Borzabadi-Farahani A. An insight into four orthodontic treatment need indices. Prog Orthod. 2011;12:132–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pio.2011.06.001

Solow B. Orthodontic screening and third party financing. Eur J Orthod. 1995;17(1):79–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/17.1.79

Järvinen S. Indexes for orthodontic treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped. 2001;120(3):237–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.114830

Sundhedsstyrelsen. Den kommunale tandpleje. Vejledning for omfanget af og kravene til den kommunale tandpleje. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen; 2023.

Indenrigs- og Sundhedsministeriet. Bekendtgørelse for omfanget af og kravene til den kommunale tandpleje, Bilag 1: Regler for ortodontivisitation og ortodontiindikationer. Copenhagen; 2023.

Olliver S, Broadbent J, Prasad S, Cai C, Thomson W, Farella M. Changes in incisor relationship over the life course: findings from a cohort study. J Dent. 2022;117:103919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103919

Helsedirektoratet. Kjeveortopedi – Kriterier for stønadsberettiget behandling. Oslo, Helsedirektoratet; 2017.

Mohlin B, Dømgaard P, Egermark I, Kurol J, Pietilä T. Hälsorisker vid obehandlade malocklusioner. Tandlaegebladet. 2007;111(1):30–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56373/2007-1-7

Negri P, Vena F, Lomurno G, Coniglio M, Cianetti S, Gatto R, et al. Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) and distribution of malocclusion traits in a population of growing patients attending a public orthodontic service in Perugia (Italy). Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(4):303–8.

Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11(3):309–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a035999

Borzabadi-Farahani A. An overview of selected orthodontic treatment need indices. In: Naretto S, editor. Principles in contemporary orthodontics [Internet]. IntechOpen; 2011. p. 215–36. Available from: www.intechopen.com [Cited date: 2025 Feb 23] DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/19735

Nakas E, Tiro A, Vrazalica L, Hadzihasanovic D, Dzemidzic V. Use of orthodontic treatment needs indices for oral health survey. Mater Soc Med. 2016;28(2):138–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2016.28.138-140

Richmond S. The use of IOTN in orthodontic services. Br Dent J. 2003;195:696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4810829

Daniels C, Richmond S. The development of the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON). J Orthod. 2000;27(2):149–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/27.2.149

Mockbil N, Huggare J. Uniformity in selection for subsidized orthodontic care – focus on borderline treatment need. Swedish Dent J. 2009;33(1):19–25.

Östring C. Bedömning av tandregleringsbehov. 117, Region Örebro län. 2025. Available from: https://www.1177.se/Orebrolan/undersokning-behandling/tandvard/bedomning-av-tandregleringsbehov/?utm_source=chatgpt.com [cited 2025 Mar 15]

Indenrigs- og Sundhedsministeriet. Ny ordning om gratis tandpleje for 18–21-årige træder i kraft i dag [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.ism.dk/nyheder/2022/juli/ny-ordning-om-gratis-tandpleje-for-18-21-aarige-traeder-i-kraft-i-dag-

Rosing K, Suominen L, Árnadóttir IB, Gahnberg L, Åstrøm AN. Udnyttelse af tandplejen i de nordiske lande. Tandlaegebladet. 2021;125(1):50–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56373/2021-1-7

Faubion B. Treatment analysis and diagnosis: a review of the literature. Am J Orthod. 1966;52(2):103–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(66)90003-0

Dowsing P, Sandler J. A guide to making appropriate orthodontic referrals. Dental Update. 2007;34(8):487–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2007.34.8.487

Narayana Prasad P, Singh Phull T, Sharma T, Dabla N, et al. Timing of orthodontic treatment. J Oral Health Community Dent. 2011;5(2):94–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/johcd-5-2-94

Grippaudo C, Quinzi V, Manai A, Paolantonio EG, Valente F, La Torre G, et al. Orthodontic treatment need and timing: assessment of evolutive malocclusion conditions and associated risk factors. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2020;21(3):203–8.

Ranganathan S, Ramachandran S, Natarajan RV, Sekaran DC, Reddy J, Nathasha M. Assessing optimal timing for orthodontic intervention: a scoping review. J Contemp Orthod. 2024;8:400–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jco.2024.061

Sundhedsstyrelsen. Tandplejeprognose 2023‑2045: Udbuddet af personale i tandplejen [Internet]. Copenhagen: Sundhedsstyrelsen; 2024 [cited 2026 Jan 28]. Available from: https://www.sst.dk/media/ofpbg0ms/tandplejeprognose-2023-2045-udbuddet-af-personale-i-tandplejen.pdf?sc_lang=da&hash=B993D699C64507EBBD65A3F8071E9F88

Socialstyrelsen. Statistikdatabasen: Hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal – sysselsatta och legitimationer [Internet]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; [cited 2025 Jun 1]. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/statistik-och-data/statistik/statistikdatabasen/

Hamidaddin MA. Optimal treatment timing in orthodontics: a scoping review. Eur J Dent. 2024;18:86–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768974

Järvinen S, Väätäjä P. Variability in assessment of need for orthodontic treatment when using certain treatment-need indices. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1987;15(5):261–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1987.tb00530.x

Baxmann M, Barth Z, Kript K. The role of psychology and communication skills in orthodontic practice: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06451-6

Hägglund E. Distanskonsultation inom ortodonti – En jämförelse med besökskonsultation [master’s thesis]. Umeå: Umeå universitet, Institutionen för odontologi; 2022.

Göranson E, Sonesson M, Gullbrand M, Isberg PE, Dimberg L. The reliability and validity of intraoral photographs in assessing orthodontic treatment need. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023;26(3):272–9.

Buchanan IB, Downing A, Stirrups DR. A comparison of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need applied clinically and to diagnostic records. Br J Orthod. 1994;21(2):185–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.21.2.185

Fernandes MF, Randall DM. The nature of social desirability response effects in ethics research. Bus Ethics Q. 1992;2(2):183–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3857570

Brooks J, Reed DM, Savage B. Taking off with a pilot: the importance of testing research instruments. Portsmouth: Department of Operations and Systems Management, University of Portsmouth. 2016.

Zailinawati AH, Schattner P, Mazza D. Doing a pilot study: why is it essential? Malaysian Fam Physician [Internet]. 2006;1(2–3):70–3. Available from: http://www.ejournal.afpm.org.my/ [Cited date: 2025 Jun 1]

Published

2026-07-22