Predicting gingival embrasure risk after invisible orthodontics using multimodal data and machine learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v85.46562Keywords:
Clear aligner therapy, gingival embrasure, risk prediction, machine learning, multimodal dataAbstract
Objective: To develop and validate a risk prediction model for gingival embrasures after clear aligner therapy using multimodal oral data.
Methods: A retrospective study of 340 patients (December 2022–June 2025) was randomly divided into training (n = 238) and validation (n = 102) sets (7:3). Univariate analysis, multivariate logistic regression, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were applied to identify independent risk factors. Three machine learning models – random forest (RF), logistic regression, and support vector machine – were constructed based on seven core variables. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, decision curve analysis, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values for interpretability.
Results: No significant baseline differences existed between sets (p > 0.05). Seven indicators were identified (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed percentage of bleeding on probing-positive sites, interproximal alveolar bone height, and relative movement of adjacent teeth at target site as independent risk factors, while gingival thickness, proximal contact area, interdental papilla height, and buccal/lingual bone plate thickness were protective factors (p < 0.05). The RF model performed best: training AUC = 0.849 (95% CI: 0.786–0.912), validation AUC = 0.815 (95% CI: 0.720–0.910), with good calibration and net benefit. SHAP analysis highlighted gingival thickness and interproximal alveolar bone height as key predictors.
Conclusion: A risk prediction model for post-clear aligner gingival embrasures was successfully developed and validated using multimodal oral data, with RF as the optimal algorithm. The model exhibits good discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility, which can be used as an objective auxiliary tool for individualized risk prediction following clear aligner therapy and supplement traditional clinical empirical judgment.
Downloads
References
Zhang Y, Li X, Wang X, Lei X, Gao J, Zhang X, et al. Clear aligners and open gingival embrasures: retrospective study of epidemiology and risk factors. J Periodontol. 2025;97(3):373-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.11373
Rashid ZJ, Gul SS, Shaikh MS, Abdulkareem AA, Zafar MS. Incidence of gingival black triangles following treatment with ffxed orthodontic appliance: a systematic review. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(8):1373. Fel! Ogiltig hyperlänkreferens. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10081373
Ogawa Y, Zuhr O, Avila-Ortiz G, Kosaka Y, Ishikawa T, Tsai YC, et al. Interdisciplinary management of open interproximal embrasures. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2026;38(4):753-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.70015
Zhang T, Zhang L, Li M, Yi F, Li C, Lu Y. Morphological changes in alveolar bone thickness and height after orthodontic proclination or labial move-mentcombined with autogenous soft tissue grafting: a CBCT eval-uation.BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02944-w
Ramos de Faria F, de Sá Werneck C, Kuchenbecker Rösing C, Willer Farinazzo Vitral R, José da Silva Campos M. Lower incisor inclination and thickness of the alveolar process and mandibular symphysis in the development of gingival recession: a retrospective cohort study. Saudi Dent J. 2023;35(6):651–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.05.016
Cui W, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Lei L, Li H. Risk factors for open gingival embrasures after clear aligners treatment: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05915-5
Alsulaimani L, Qali M. Relationship between cone-beam CT evaluation and clinical evaluation before and after orthodontic treatment and the rate of gingival recession: a systematic review. Cureus. 2024;16(6):e62536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.62536
Karkazi F, Antoniadou M, Demeterová K, Konstantonis D, Margaritis V, Lysy J. Orthodontic risk perspectives among orthodontists during treatment: a descriptive pilot study in Greece and Slovakia. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(4):492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12040492
Nordland WP, Tarnow DP. A classification system for loss of papillary height. J Periodontol. 1998;69(10):1124–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.10.1124
Sharma AA, Park JH. Esthetic considerations in interdental papilla: remediation and regeneration. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010;22(1):18–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2009.00307.x
Tüfekçi E, Carrico CK, Gordon CB, Lindauer SJ. How AI-driven root and bone predictions can assist clear aligner treatment planning. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2025;28(Suppl. 1):S18–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12921
Wolf D, Farrag G, Flügge T, Timm LH. Predicting outcome in clear aligner treatment: a machine learning analysis. J Clin Med. 2024;13(13):3672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133672
Ghasemi N, Jahanbin A, Kazemi M, Shadi E, Shahabi M, Shirkhani Z. Assessment of risk factors for black triangle formation after orthodontic treatment with premolar extractions. Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2025;14(1):e276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21142/2523-2754-1401-2026-276
Ahmad SI, Olczyk J, Araújo AS, de Moura Medeiros JP, Teixeira VC, Gomes CFA, et al. A novel multimodal deep image analysis model for predicting extraction/non-extraction decision. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2026;29(1):101–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70057
Kloukos D, Koukos G, Doulis I, Stavropoulos A, Katsaros C. Does incisor inclination change during orthodontic treatment affect gingival thickness and the width of keratinized gingiva? A prospective controlled study. Eur J Orthod. 2025;47(2):cjaf001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf001
Gül İ, Çolak R, Cicek O. Evaluation of the effect of periodontal health and orthodontic treatment on gingival recession: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):1069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06449-6
Li N, Wang C, Yang M, Chen D, Tang M, Li D, et al. Effects of different tooth movement patterns and aligner thicknesses on maxillary arch expansion with clear aligners: a three-dimensional finite element study. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;12:1424319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1424319
Trakulmututa S, Win KT. Machine learning in orthodontics: transforming invisalign treatment planning through precision, interpretability, and ethical practices. Int J Med Inform. 2026;206:106139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106139
Li G, Guo F, Chen J, Li H, Lei L. A novel machine-learning-based model for prediction of open gingival embrasures between mandibular central incisors after clear aligners treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Prog Orthod. 2025;26(1):39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-025-00584-0
Vincent-Bugnas S, Borsa L, Gruss A, Lupi L. Prioritization of predisposing factors of gingival hyperplasia during orthodontic treatment: the role of amount of biofilm. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01433-2
Peng J, Zhang Y, Zheng M, Wu Y, Deng G, Lyu J, et al. Predicting changes of incisor and facial profile following orthodontic treatment: a machine learning approach. Head Face Med. 2025;21(1):22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-025-00499-5
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Haiyan Wang, Hanfei Shi, Liping Fan, Zhang Sun, Xuelian Xiu, Hui Yuan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica publishes high quality original research papers as well as critical reviews relevant on diseases of the oral cavity, their treatment, epidemiology and associated biomaterials and their development.
