Radiographic assessment and orthodontic intervention effects on orthodontically induced root resorption: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v85.46818Keywords:
Radiographic methods, root resorption, orthodontic treatment, detection accuracy, systematic reviewAbstract
The relative contribution of radiographic methods and characteristics of the orthodontic intervention to orthodontically induced root resorption (OIRR) remains unknown. The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to (1) estimate the pooled OIRR effect across orthodontic intervention versus comparator contrasts, (2) compare pooled estimates by radiographic method (2D [two-dimensional] vs. 3D/CBCT [three-dimensional/cone-beam computed tomography]), and (3) explore whether force mechanics (intrusive versus nonintrusive) modified OIRR magnitude.
Seven randomized controlled trials and one prospective study (January 2010–October 2025) were included. Only OIRR was the outcome, reported as correlation coefficients (r). The primary analysis combined within-study intervention-versus-comparator estimates. Subgroup analysis of 2D versus 3D/CBCT imaging was prespecified, whereas post-hoc analysis of intrusive versus nonintrusive mechanics was performed.
The pooled analysis for the primary outcome showed a small, nonsignificant OIRR effect (r = 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.12 to 0.27; p = 0.372) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 84.0%). Radiographic method did not change the pooled estimates significantly (p = 0.331). Force-mechanics analysis showed that intrusive mechanics was related to significantly higher root resorption than nonintrusive mechanics (r = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.65 versus r = −0.03; 95% CI = −0.16 to 0.10; p < 0.001). This accounted for 87.1% of the between-study variance.
The average orthodontic intervention effect on OIRR was small and not significant; however, the OIRR magnitude was strongly affected by force mechanics, particularly by intrusive forces. There was no significant difference in pooled estimates by radiographic method; however, 3D/CBCT provides superior volumetric quantification and should be used judiciously according ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principles.
Downloads
References
Samandara A, Papageorgiou S, Ioannidou-Marathiotou I, Kavvadia-Tsatala S, Papadopoulos M. Evaluation of orthodontically induced external root resorption following orthodontic treatment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41:67–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjy027
Lin J, Zheng Q, Wu Y, Zhou M, Chen J, Wang X, et al. Quantitative analysis and clinical determinants of orthodontically induced root resorption using automated tooth segmentation from CBCT imaging. BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 8;25(1):694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06052-9
Lund H, Gröndahl K, Hansen K, Gröndahl H. Apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment. A prospective study using cone beam CT. Angle Orthod. 2012;82(3):480–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/061311-390.1
Mohandesan H, Ravanmehr H, Valaei N. A radiographic analysis of external apical root resorption of maxillary incisors during active orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29(2):134–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjl090
Pereira S, Corte-Real A, Melo A, Magalhães L, Lavado N, Santos J. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiography for detecting apical root resorption in retention phase of orthodontic patients: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 22;13(5):1248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051248
Yazid F, Teh Y, Ashari A, Ariffin S, Wahab R. Detection methods of orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR): a review. Australas Orthod J. 2020;36:101–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2020-012
Leach H, Ireland A, Whaites E. Radiographic diagnosis of root resorption in relation to orthodontics. Br Dent J. 2001;190:16–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800870a
Deng Y, Sun Y, Xu T. Evaluation of root resorption after comprehensive orthodontic treatment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Jun 27;18(1):116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0579-2
Singh J, Adarsh S, Kumar K, Gupta A, Sinha A. Comparison of apical root resorption in patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliance and clear aligners: a cone-beam computed tomography study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22(7):763–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3119
Dudic A, Giannopoulou C, Leuzinger M, Kiliaridis S. Detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(4):434–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.10.014
Faisal Mohamed Faisal, Dheaa H Al-Groosh, Comparison between Conventional Orthopantomograph and Three Dimensional Reconstructed OPG from Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Evaluation of Root Resorption during Orthodontic Treatment, J Res Med Dent Sci, 2020, 8(1): 167-174.
Kara-Boulad JM, Burhan AS, Hajeer MY, Nawaya FR, Jaber ST. CBCT-based assessment of apical root resorption and alveolar bone height following orthodontic treatment of class I moderate crowding with labial vs. lingual fixed appliances in young adults: a randomized controlled trial. Int Orthod. 2025;23(2):100968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2025.100968
Alqahtani KA, Jacobs R, Shujaat S, Politis C, Shaheen E. Automated three-dimensional quantification of external root resorption following combined orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment. A validation study. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Feb;124(1S):101289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2022.09.010
Zheng Q, Ma L, Wu Y, Gao Y, Li H, Lin J, et al. Automatic 3-dimensional quantification of orthodontically induced root resorption in cone-beam computed tomography images based on deep learning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2025;167(2):188–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.09.009
Gandhi V, Mehta S, Gauthier M, Mu J, Kuo C, Nanda R, et al. Comparison of external apical root resorption with clear aligners and pre-adjusted edgewise appliances in non-extraction cases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaa013
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;2019(10):ED000142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000142
Amir-Behghadami M, Janati A. Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews. Emerg Med J. 2020;37:387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209567
Sterne JA, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
Hayashino Y, Noguchi Y, Fukui T. Systematic evaluation and comparison of statistical tests for publication bias. J Epidemiol. 2005;15:235–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.15.235
Chun JH, de Castro ACR, Oh S, Kim KH, Choi SH, Nojima LI, et al. Skeletal and alveolar changes in conventional rapid palatal expansion (RPE) and miniscrew-assisted RPE (MARPE): a prospective randomized clinical trial using low-dose CBCT. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02138-w
Hung KF, Yeung AWK, Wong MCM, Bornstein MM, Leung YY. Comparing standard- and low-dose CBCT in diagnosis and treatment decisions for impacted mandibular third molars: a non-inferiority randomized clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(12):647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06022-5
Salah HM, Hashem AAR, Mustafa T, Soliman AH, Khallaf M, Haddadeen H. The impact of root end filling material type and the application of bone graft on healing of periapical tissues after endodontic microsurgery: a clinical randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):25378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66033-w
Attia AM, Shibl LA, Dehis HM, Mostafa YA, El-Beialy AR. Evaluation of anchorage loss after en masse retraction in orthodontic patients with maxillary protrusion using friction vs frictionless mechanics: randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2024;94(5):532–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/113023-791.1
Patel S, Abella F, Patel K, Bakhsh A, Lambrechts P, Al-Nuaimi N. Potential predisposing features of external cervical resorption: an observational study. Int Endod J. 2025;58(2):273–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14166
Gonzalez-Hernandez E, Romero R, Campos D, Burychka D, Diego-Pedro R, Baños R, et al. Cognitively-Based Compassion Training (CBCT®) in breast cancer survivors: a randomized clinical trial study. Integr Cancer Ther. 2018;17(3):684–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735418772095
Pul U, Tichy A, Pitchika V, Schwendicke F. Impact of artificial intelligence assistance on diagnosing periapical radiolucencies: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent. 2025;160:105868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105868
Alzahawi K, Færøvig E, Brudvik P, Bøe OE, Mavragani M. Root resorption after leveling with super-elastic and conventional steel arch wires: a prospective study. Prog Orthod. 2014;15:35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0035-z
Karadeniz EI, Gonzales C, Turk T, Isci D, Sahin-Saglam AM, Alkis H, et al. Effect of fluoride on root resorption following heavy and light orthodontic force application. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(3):418–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/072512-606.1
de Almeida MR, Marçal ASB, Fernandes TMF, Vasconcelos JB, de Almeida RR, Nanda R. A comparative study of the effect of the intrusion arch and straight wire mechanics on incisor root resorption: a randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod. 2018;88(1):20–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/06417-424R
DiBiase AT, Woodhouse NR, Papageorgiou SN, Johnson N, Slipper C, Grant J, et al. Effect of supplemental vibrational force on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;150(6):918–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.025
Phermsang-Ngarm P, Charoemratrote C. Tooth and bone changes after initial anterior dental alignment using preformed vs customized nickel titanium archwires in adults: a randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2018;88(4):425–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/090317-589.1
Raza H, Major P, Dederich D, El-Bialy T. Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on orthodontically induced root resorption caused by torque: a prospective, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(4):550–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/081915-554.1
Mordente CM, Oliveira DD, Palomo JM, Cardoso PA, Assis MA, Zenóbio EG, et al. The effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of maxillary incisors’ retraction in orthodontic space closure: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Prog Orthod. 2024;25(1):6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-023-00505-z
Shaadouh RI, Hajeer MY, Alam MK, Jaber ST. Effect of low-intensity electrical stimulation on external apical root resorption and periodontal indices following en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth in young adults: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025;11(4):e70188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70188
Sedgwick P, Marston L. How to read a funnel plot in a meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;351:h4718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4718
Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JA. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med. 2006;25:3443–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2380
Andrade C. Understanding the basics of meta-analysis and how to read a forest plot: as simple as it gets. J Clin Psychiatry. 2020;81(1):20f13698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.20f13698
Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C, Hunter R, Benavides E, Samuelson DB, et al. Effective dose of dental CBCT – a meta-analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140197
Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(9):1237–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0339
Horner K, SEDENTEXCT Guideline Panel. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology (evidence-based guidelines). Luxembourg: European Commission; 2012.
Hajeer MY, Al-Homsi HK, Alfailany DA, Murad RM. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of CBCT-based interpretations of maxillary impacted canines compared to conventional radiography: an in vitro study. Int Orthod. 2022;20(2):100639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100639
Alsino HI, Hajeer MY, Alkhouri I, Murad RM. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT imaging in detecting and measuring dehiscence and fenestration in Class I malocclusion: a surgical-exposure-based validation study. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e22789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22789
Sirri MR, Burhan AS, Hajeer MY, Nawaya FR. Evaluation of corticision-based acceleration of lower anterior teeth alignment in terms of root resorption and dehiscence formation using CBCT: a randomized controlled trial. Int Orthod. 2021;19(4):580–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2021.10.001
Isola G, Matarese G, Cordasco G, Perillo L, Ramaglia L. Mechanobiology of the tooth movement during the orthodontic treatment: a literature review. Minerva Stomatol. 2016 Oct;65(5):299-327.
Henneman S, Von den Hoff JW, Maltha J. Mechanobiology of tooth movement. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30(3):299–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn020
Yassir YA, McIntyre GT, Bearn DR. Orthodontic treatment and root resorption: an overview of systematic reviews. Eur J Orthod. 2021;43(4):442–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaa058
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Khalid Ayidh Alqahtani, Hamod Alqahtani, Abdullah Saad Alqahtani, Mahmud Uz Zaman, Wajdi A. Mohammed (Bin), Saleh Alhindi, Nasser Raqe Alqhtani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica publishes high quality original research papers as well as critical reviews relevant on diseases of the oral cavity, their treatment, epidemiology and associated biomaterials and their development.
