Rasch analysis of the UK Functional Assessment Measure in patients with complex disability after stroke

Authors

  • Oleg N. Medvedev
  • Lynne Turner-Stokes
  • Stephen Ashford
  • Richard J. Siegert

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2324

Keywords:

patient, physiopathology, psychometrics, Rasch, functional assessment.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether the UK Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM+FAM) fits the Rasch model in stroke patients with complex disability and, if so, to derive a conversion table of Rasch-transformed interval level scores. Methods: The sample included a UK multicentre cohort of 1,318 patients admitted for specialist rehabilitation following a stroke. Rasch analysis was conducted for the 30-item scale including 3 domains of items measuring physical, communication and psychosocial functions. The fit of items to the Rasch model was examined using 3 different analytical approaches referred to as "pathways". Results: The best fit was achieved in the pathway where responses from motor, communication and psychosocial domains were summarized into 3 super-items and where some items were split because of differential item functioning (DIF) relative to left and right hemisphere location (χ2 (10) = 14.48, p = 0.15). Re-scoring of items showing disordered thresholds did not significantly improve the overall model fit. Conclusion: The UK FIM+FAM with domain super-items satisfies expectations of the unidimensional Rasch model without the need for re-scoring. A conversion table was produced to convert the total scale scores into interval-level data based on person estimates of the Rasch model. The clinical benefits of interval-transformed scores require further evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-21

How to Cite

Medvedev, O. N., Turner-Stokes, L., Ashford, S., & Siegert, R. J. (2018). Rasch analysis of the UK Functional Assessment Measure in patients with complex disability after stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 50(5), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2324

Issue

Section

Original Report