Sports participation after rehabilitation: Barriers and facilitators.

Authors

  • Eva A. Jaarsma
  • Rienk Dekker
  • Jan H.B. Geertzen
  • Pieter Dijkstra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2017

Keywords:

disabled persons, sports, rehabilitation.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse barriers to, and facilitators of, sports participation among people with physical disabilities after rehabilitation and to compare differences between inactive and active participants regarding these experienced barriers and facilitators. METHODS: Participants were 1,223 adults (mean age 51.6 years, standard deviation 15.1 years) treated in the Rehabilitation Centre of the University Medical Center Groningen, who completed a questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of a self-constructed questionnaire regarding barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of the participants were active in sports after their rehabilitation. Younger age and a higher level of education were positively associated with sports participation, whereas using assistive devices and experiencing environmental barriers were negatively associated. Facilitators of sports participation were health, fun and increasing physical strength, and advice from rehabilitation professionals. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation professionals should emphasize the health benefits of, and enjoyment from, sports participation for people with physical disabilities. They should repeatedly remind people with physical disabilities to stay/become active after completing their rehabilitation programme. Rehabilitation professionals should also provide information about strategies to reduce environmental barriers to sports participation, which could help people using assistive devices to overcome these barriers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2015-10-22

How to Cite

Jaarsma, E. A., Dekker, R., Geertzen, J. H., & Dijkstra, P. (2015). Sports participation after rehabilitation: Barriers and facilitators. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 48(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2017

Issue

Section

Original Report